Forum Discussion
moving average over 26 weeks
How is the week value stored, is it just an integer, and does it reset yearly? Assuming yes and yes, I'd try looking up solutions on how people have created a yearmonth column in a date table - if you can do similar and end up with something like 201652 for the last week of last year and 201701 for the first week of this year, then you've got a single integer where the highest values are the most recent. It should be straightforward to use something like TOPN(26) as a filter for an average on your hours column
- emmaclarke838 years ago
Helper I
Hi, yes an integer.
I can make a year/week column no problem. However, the top26 will not work as this ia a moving average. I have attached a link above to an example Excel to show you what I mean.- v-caliao-msft8 years ago
Microsoft Employee
You could use the measure below to get moving average over 26 weeks.
26WeekMovingSumHour = VAR minweeknumber = MAX ( Table1[Weeknumber] ) - 26 VAR maxweeknumber = MAX ( Table1[Weeknumber] ) RETURN CALCULATE ( Table1[TotalWeekHour], FILTER ( ALL ( Table1 ), Table1[Weeknumber] > minweeknumber && Table1[Weeknumber] <= maxweeknumber ) )numberofweeks = VAR minweeknumber = MAX ( Table1[Weeknumber] ) - 26 VAR maxweeknumber = MAX ( Table1[Weeknumber] ) RETURN CALCULATE ( DISTINCTCOUNT ( Table1[Weeknumber] ), FILTER ( ALL ( Table1 ), Table1[Weeknumber] > minweeknumber && Table1[Weeknumber] <= maxweeknumber ) )26WeekMovingAverageHour = VAR minweeknumber = MAX ( Table1[Weeknumber] ) - 26 VAR maxweeknumber = MAX ( Table1[Weeknumber] ) VAR numberofWeek = CALCULATE ( DISTINCTCOUNT ( Table1[Weeknumber] ), FILTER ( ALL ( Table1 ), Table1[Weeknumber] > minweeknumber && Table1[Weeknumber] <= maxweeknumber ) ) VAR WeekMovingSumHour = CALCULATE ( Table1[TotalWeekHour], FILTER ( ALL ( Table1 ), Table1[Weeknumber] > minweeknumber && Table1[Weeknumber] <= maxweeknumber ) ) RETURN WeekMovingSumHour / numberofWeekRegards,
Charlie Liao
- emmaclarke838 years ago
Helper I
Hi Charlie Thanks for your reply. I think this is close to what I need but I need it for each employee and when I add the employee number field the calculations don't look correct. Is there anything else I can do? Thanks Emma