Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Microsoft is giving away 50,000 FREE Microsoft Certification exam vouchers. Get Fabric certified for FREE! Learn more

Reply
EmilePl
Frequent Visitor

Trying to combine old and new software

Hi,

 

Last year, we started rolling out a new ERP system that's fundamentally different from our old one.
Previously, when combining multiple sources, i would try to align the structure of the SQL query and append/union them.
Now I'm trying to use separate fact tables but with common dimensions, but i'm running into trouble when a dimension exists in the new software, but not in the old one.

I've simplified it in an example, where the "region" dimension was not available in the old software:
My two fact tables look like this

screenshot 1.png

 

 

 

 


My relationships like this

screenshot 2.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I created 3 measures:

Turnover old software = SUM('Old software'[Turnover])
Turnover new software = SUM('new software'[Turnover])

Turnover overall = Turnover old software + Turnover new software

 

Now, when i create a table that attributes the overall turnover to the regions i would expect something like this

YearRegionTurnover overall
2021Blank5.000.000
2022Blank6.000.000
2023Blank7.500.000
2023Europe1.200.000
2023USA3.000.000


Since it can't attribute the turnover from the old software to a region, it should create a blank category.
But instead, it's adding the turnover it can't attribute to each category, like this:

screenshot 3.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is this expected behaviour? If so, can you help me understand why?
Is there a solution?

Thank you!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi @EmilePl ,

Based on my test results, it seems that this behaviour may occur because of automatic aggregation of processed data

vxiandatmsft_0-1712887714435.pngvxiandatmsft_1-1712887725828.png

When you join the region it will give him an equal share of the turnover depending on the date.

Best Regards,

Xianda Tang

If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

 

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi @EmilePl ,

Based on my test results, it seems that this behaviour may occur because of automatic aggregation of processed data

vxiandatmsft_0-1712887714435.pngvxiandatmsft_1-1712887725828.png

When you join the region it will give him an equal share of the turnover depending on the date.

Best Regards,

Xianda Tang

If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

 

Helpful resources

Announcements
PBIApril_Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - April 2025

Check out the April 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.

Notebook Gallery Carousel1

NEW! Community Notebooks Gallery

Explore and share Fabric Notebooks to boost Power BI insights in the new community notebooks gallery.

April2025 Carousel

Fabric Community Update - April 2025

Find out what's new and trending in the Fabric community.

Top Solution Authors