Too many values to show in Treemap and it removes some of the largest values instead of the small

[Anonymous]

Hi,

I have made a treemap based on a creditorlist grouped by payment criteria in 4 categories and split by the names of the creditors.

At the top of the visual, it says "There are too many values, not all values are shown". This is fine as I don't need to show the "small" creditors, but only the larger ones. However, some of the very largest creditors in each group are not shown.

When I download the data based on the visual, all the creditors are in the table, but e.g. the second largest won't show in the visual.

In the below, you can see my treemap categorized and below that is the data that goes into the treemap. The creditors marked yellow are not shown in the "60+ dage" category, even though they contain way higher values than those shown.

treemapdata in treemap

How come it removes some of the values, that should be most important based on size?

Can I do anything to show those values instead of some of the smaller ones?

Any advise or info is much appreciated!

Thank you for your time 🙂

[AllisonKennedy · Accepted solution]

It will skew your map, but you could filter for top N creditors.

Alternatively you could group the creditors, but not easy to do dynamically based on measure size.

[v-jayw-msft · Accepted solution]

Hi @Anonymous ,

You could create a measure or a calculated column to rank the values. Then filter the vsiaul according to the rank value.

Best Regards,

Jay

[AllisonKennedy · Accepted solution]

It will skew your map, but you could filter for top N creditors.

Alternatively you could group the creditors, but not easy to do dynamically based on measure size.