Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!Learn from the best! Meet the four finalists headed to the FINALS of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships! Register now
Hi all,
The new feature in the April 2017 release, allowing conenction to a live Power BI dataset, seems like an important one,
but then I thought about it, and I cannot find a reason why this is any different than creating reports on the service(using the browser) on top of an existing dataset.
I'm sure I'm missing something. What is it?
Thanks !
Solved! Go to Solution.
You can still create reports in Service, but a large set of advantages exist because Desktop offers a richer authoring experience, you can more easily have a PBIX in source control, you don't get multiple datasets that contain the same model when deploying multiple Desktop reports to Service, etc.
You can still create reports in Service, but a large set of advantages exist because Desktop offers a richer authoring experience, you can more easily have a PBIX in source control, you don't get multiple datasets that contain the same model when deploying multiple Desktop reports to Service, etc.
Thanks @deldersveld, I think that the richer experience with Power BI desktop has to do mostly with working on the dataset(adding columns, measures etc.) which isn't relevant to a live connection to a Power BI dataset, and in addition,
when you create reports on the service, they don't result in multiple datasets as well.
However, your source control argument wins. Haven't thought about it. Thanks!
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
Check out the February 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 53 | |
| 48 | |
| 31 | |
| 16 | |
| 14 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 86 | |
| 71 | |
| 38 | |
| 28 | |
| 25 |