Forum Discussion
Table filtered by slicer
- 6 years ago
Thank you. I get it. Actually my problem is bit more complex than this - the states and LGs are not a one to many realatioship. The LG is a kind of local geography that are poorly aligned with the states boundaries, that is, one LG may possibly cross 2 to 3 states. The problem I'm faced with is to apply the concordance data (i.e. proportions of a LG assigned to different containing states if it's not fully contained by one signle state) to LGs once a state is selected. I'll repost my problem as a new post. For this consider case closed. Thank you.
Charlie
Can you please share the sample data and let us know the common column from the 2 tables to re-pro the issue from our end.
If possible please share the expected result.
Thanks for responding but I realised why it's not working having searched the community - a calculated table is static and will not respond to the slicer on the fly. I'll need to find another approach to my task.