Microsoft is giving away 50,000 FREE Microsoft Certification exam vouchers!
Enter the sweepstakes now!Preparing for a certification exam? Ask exam experts all your questions on May 15th. Register now.
Hi, I have a visual "Table like" containing
Product-Country, Sales, Switch, KPI1 (all those fields are coming from 1 table called SFA_BIAS)
Siwtch is a value = -1 or 1
and 1 filter applied on the visual on Switch (et's say 1)
When I apply the TOPN 10 on Product-Country field based on Sales, I would expect to get the Top 10 Product-country based on Sales having Switch = 1
the table shows no records, as if the TOPN 10 would apply on the full data behind (as the top 10 Product-Country sales without filtering have a switch = -1)
I have also tried with a Rank
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @Jlbaenlo ,
My sample data is this.
Product-CountrySalesSwitchKPI1
JP | 1 | 1 | 1 |
JP | 10 | 1 | 2 |
CN | 3 | 1 | 3 |
CN | 4 | 1 | 4 |
USA | 12 | 1 | 5 |
USA | 15 | 1 | 6 |
UK | 7 | 1 | 7 |
UK | 8 | 1 | 8 |
JP | 9 | 1 | 9 |
JP | 4 | 1 | 10 |
CN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
CN | 16 | 1 | 2 |
USA | 3 | 1 | 3 |
USA | 15 | 1 | 4 |
UK | 18 | 1 | 5 |
UK | 9 | 1 | 6 |
UK | 5 | -1 | 7 |
JP | 6 | -1 | 8 |
JP | 1 | -1 | 9 |
CN | 2 | -1 | 10 |
CN | 3 | -1 | 1 |
USA | 4 | -1 | 2 |
USA | 8 | -1 | 3 |
UK | 8 | -1 | 1 |
UK | 7 | -1 | 2 |
JP | 2 | -1 | 3 |
JP | 1 | -1 | 4 |
CN | 3 | -1 | 5 |
CN | 6 | -1 | 6 |
USA | 5 | -1 | 7 |
USA | 1 | -1 | 8 |
UK | 9 | -1 | 9 |
UK | 9 | -1 | 10 |
You could try to create a measure.This measure is to sort switch=1 and switch=-1 respectively.
Measure =
VAR ran =
RANKX (
FILTER ( ALL ( 'SFA_BIAS' ), 'SFA_BIAS'[Switch] = MAX ( 'SFA_BIAS'[Switch] ) ),
CALCULATE ( MAX ( 'SFA_BIAS'[Sales] ) ),
,
ASC,
SKIP
)
RETURN
IF ( ran <= 10, 1, 0 )
Put the measure into Filters and set it.
The result is this.
You can check more details form here.
Best Regards,
Stephen Tao
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi @Jlbaenlo ,
My sample data is this.
Product-CountrySalesSwitchKPI1
JP | 1 | 1 | 1 |
JP | 10 | 1 | 2 |
CN | 3 | 1 | 3 |
CN | 4 | 1 | 4 |
USA | 12 | 1 | 5 |
USA | 15 | 1 | 6 |
UK | 7 | 1 | 7 |
UK | 8 | 1 | 8 |
JP | 9 | 1 | 9 |
JP | 4 | 1 | 10 |
CN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
CN | 16 | 1 | 2 |
USA | 3 | 1 | 3 |
USA | 15 | 1 | 4 |
UK | 18 | 1 | 5 |
UK | 9 | 1 | 6 |
UK | 5 | -1 | 7 |
JP | 6 | -1 | 8 |
JP | 1 | -1 | 9 |
CN | 2 | -1 | 10 |
CN | 3 | -1 | 1 |
USA | 4 | -1 | 2 |
USA | 8 | -1 | 3 |
UK | 8 | -1 | 1 |
UK | 7 | -1 | 2 |
JP | 2 | -1 | 3 |
JP | 1 | -1 | 4 |
CN | 3 | -1 | 5 |
CN | 6 | -1 | 6 |
USA | 5 | -1 | 7 |
USA | 1 | -1 | 8 |
UK | 9 | -1 | 9 |
UK | 9 | -1 | 10 |
You could try to create a measure.This measure is to sort switch=1 and switch=-1 respectively.
Measure =
VAR ran =
RANKX (
FILTER ( ALL ( 'SFA_BIAS' ), 'SFA_BIAS'[Switch] = MAX ( 'SFA_BIAS'[Switch] ) ),
CALCULATE ( MAX ( 'SFA_BIAS'[Sales] ) ),
,
ASC,
SKIP
)
RETURN
IF ( ran <= 10, 1, 0 )
Put the measure into Filters and set it.
The result is this.
You can check more details form here.
Best Regards,
Stephen Tao
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
@Jlbaenlo - Sorry, having trouble following, can you post sample data as text and expected output?
Check out the April 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Explore and share Fabric Notebooks to boost Power BI insights in the new community notebooks gallery.
User | Count |
---|---|
76 | |
72 | |
71 | |
48 | |
41 |
User | Count |
---|---|
54 | |
48 | |
33 | |
32 | |
28 |