Forum Discussion
Split amount between departments
- Anonymous6 years ago
I will give a step by step solution to this. I suggest you start with a blank Power BI file and start from scratch for better understanding.
Step 1: Add the DIMSplit table to your data model using the "New table" option using the following code.
DIMSplit = DATATABLE ( "ID", STRING, "Dep", STRING, "Share", INTEGER, { { "aaa", "90-1", "150" }, { "aaa", "90-2", "150" }, { "aaa", "90-3", "200" }, { "bbb", "90-1", "50" }, { "bbb", "90-2", "50" } } )Step 2: Add the "FACTTrans" table to your data model using the "New Table" option using the following code.
FACTTrans = DATATABLE ( "Date", DATETIME, "Amount", DOUBLE, "Dep", STRING, "SplitID", STRING, { { "01-01-2020", "10.000", "90-1", "aaa" }, { "01-01-2020", "15.000", "90-1", "bbb" }, { "01-01-2020", "25.000", "90-1", BLANK () }, { "02-02-2020", "20.000", "90-1", "aaa" }, { "03-03-2020", "30.000", "90-1", "bbb" } } )Step 3: Add the "Expected Result" table to your data model using the "New Table" option using the following DAX code.
ExpectedResult = VAR SumTable = SUMMARIZECOLUMNS ( FACTTrans[Date], DIMSplit[Dep], DIMSplit[ID] ) VAR EmptyIDTable = GENERATE ( SUMMARIZECOLUMNS ( 'FACTTrans'[Date], DIMSplit[Dep] ), ROW ( "ID", BLANK () ) ) RETURN UNION ( SumTable, EmptyIDTable )Step 4: Add the following calculated columns to the "Expected Result" table using the following DAX codes.
Amt = VAR CurrentDate = ExpectedResult[Date] VAR CurrentDepartment = ExpectedResult[Dep] VAR CurrentID = ExpectedResult[ID] RETURN SUMX ( FILTER ( FACTTrans, FACTTrans[Dep] = CurrentDepartment && FACTTrans[Date] = CurrentDate && FACTTrans[SplitID] = CurrentID ), FACTTrans[Amount] )DateIDAmount = VAR CurrentDate = ExpectedResult[Date] VAR CurrentID = ExpectedResult[ID] VAR Sum1 = SUMX ( FILTER ( ExpectedResult, ExpectedResult[Date] = CurrentDate && ExpectedResult[ID] = CurrentID ), ExpectedResult[Amt] ) VAR Sum2 = ExpectedResult[Amt] RETURN IF ( ISBLANK ( ExpectedResult[ID] ), Sum2, Sum1 )PercentageSplit = VAR CurrentID = ExpectedResult[ID] VAR CurrentDep = ExpectedResult[Dep] VAR DepIDAmount = SUMX ( FILTER ( DIMSplit, DIMSplit[Dep] = CurrentDep && DIMSplit[ID] = CurrentID ), DIMSplit[Share] ) VAR IDAmount = SUMX ( FILTER ( DIMSplit, DIMSplit[ID] = CurrentID ), DIMSplit[Share] ) RETURN IF ( ISBLANK ( ExpectedResult[ID] ), 1, DIVIDE ( DepIDAmount, IDAmount, 0 ) )FinalAmount = ExpectedResult[DateIDAmount] * ExpectedResult[PercentageSplit]Step 5: Add a matrix visual to your report and use the Expected Result table's date(month) and Department fields to column and rows respectively and add the "Final Amount" field to the "Values" section of the matrix which will give you the following result.
This is not an optimum solution, but nevertheless you will get the results and you can also see the intermediate results at every step. Later on, you may simplify the codes or rewrite the same using measures though that will be consuming your CPU power a lot if your dataset is quite large.
Please let me know if you have any trouble understanding any of the DAX code snippets. By the way, there are no relationships between any of these tables.
- Anonymous6 years ago
Hi Anonymous
Using a small bridge table, you can achieve the results using a measure itself instead of using the "Expected Result" calculated table and the other "calculated columns" in that table.
The 2nd solution using measure is as follows...
Prerequisite: Open a blank Power BI file and complete Step 1 & Step 2 mentioned earlier to create the "DIMSplit" and "FACTTrans" tables.
Step 3: Create a bridge table - Use calculated table / New table with the following DAX code.
IDs_BridgeTable = ALL(DIMSplit[ID])Step 4: Create the following relationships.
IDs_BridgeTable[ID] -> DIMSplit[ID], One to Many, Active relationship
IDs_BridgeTable[ID] -> FACTTrans[SplitID], One to Many, Active relationship
DIMSplit[Dep] <-> FACTTrans[Dep], Many to Many, Inactive relationship
Step 5: Create a Measure
ExpectedResult = VAR IT_TABLE = ADDCOLUMNS ( SUMMARIZE ( DIMSplit, DIMSplit[ID], DIMSplit[Dep] ), "ID_Dep_Amount", CALCULATE ( SUMX ( FACTTrans, FACTTrans[Amount] ), CROSSFILTER ( DIMSplit[ID], IDs_BridgeTable[ID], BOTH ) ), "ID_Total", CALCULATE ( SUMX ( DIMSplit, DIMSplit[Share] ), ALL ( DIMSplit[Dep] ) ), "ID_Dep_Share", CALCULATE ( SUMX ( DIMSplit, DIMSplit[Share] ) ) ) VAR Res1 = SUMX ( IT_TABLE, [ID_Dep_Amount] * DIVIDE ( [ID_Dep_Share], [ID_Total], 0 ) ) VAR Res2 = CALCULATE ( SUMX ( FILTER ( FACTTrans, FACTTrans[SplitID] = "" ), FACTTrans[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( DIMSplit[Dep], FACTTrans[Dep] ) ) VAR Result = Res1 + Res2 RETURN ResultStep 6: Use a matrix visual and use DIMSplit[Dep] on Rows, FACTTrans[Date].Month on Columns, and the measure "Expected Result" created on Step 5 in the "Values" section of the matrix to get the following result.
The major difference between the earlier solution and this is that the earlier one is relying on calculated tables and calculated columns created using DAX and the result is stored in the data model in a separate table. But in this case, the result is calculated using only a measure without the need for any calculated table or calculated columns except for the bridge table in many to many relationship. We could have avoided the bridge table also, but it will make the measure more complicated.
You may try both approaches in your data model and use "Performance Analyser" to evaluate and compare the performance between both the approaches and its difference will be evident if you use a really large dataset. It is up to you to decide between the two approaches.
Anonymous
Thanks for the great explanation.
I do have a date calendar in my model, and FACTTrans I think will be less than 1 mio.
I can make a brigde table if needed.
If you can guide me to the needed bridge table and guide me in the direction of the optimal code, that would be great.
I will study your step by step anyway, for sure 🙂
Regards
Henrik
Hi Anonymous
Using a small bridge table, you can achieve the results using a measure itself instead of using the "Expected Result" calculated table and the other "calculated columns" in that table.
The 2nd solution using measure is as follows...
Prerequisite: Open a blank Power BI file and complete Step 1 & Step 2 mentioned earlier to create the "DIMSplit" and "FACTTrans" tables.
Step 3: Create a bridge table - Use calculated table / New table with the following DAX code.
IDs_BridgeTable = ALL(DIMSplit[ID])
Step 4: Create the following relationships.
IDs_BridgeTable[ID] -> DIMSplit[ID], One to Many, Active relationship
IDs_BridgeTable[ID] -> FACTTrans[SplitID], One to Many, Active relationship
DIMSplit[Dep] <-> FACTTrans[Dep], Many to Many, Inactive relationship
Step 5: Create a Measure
ExpectedResult =
VAR IT_TABLE =
ADDCOLUMNS (
SUMMARIZE ( DIMSplit, DIMSplit[ID], DIMSplit[Dep] ),
"ID_Dep_Amount", CALCULATE (
SUMX ( FACTTrans, FACTTrans[Amount] ),
CROSSFILTER ( DIMSplit[ID], IDs_BridgeTable[ID], BOTH )
),
"ID_Total", CALCULATE ( SUMX ( DIMSplit, DIMSplit[Share] ), ALL ( DIMSplit[Dep] ) ),
"ID_Dep_Share", CALCULATE ( SUMX ( DIMSplit, DIMSplit[Share] ) )
)
VAR Res1 =
SUMX ( IT_TABLE, [ID_Dep_Amount] * DIVIDE ( [ID_Dep_Share], [ID_Total], 0 ) )
VAR Res2 =
CALCULATE (
SUMX ( FILTER ( FACTTrans, FACTTrans[SplitID] = "" ), FACTTrans[Amount] ),
USERELATIONSHIP ( DIMSplit[Dep], FACTTrans[Dep] )
)
VAR Result = Res1 + Res2
RETURN
Result
Step 6: Use a matrix visual and use DIMSplit[Dep] on Rows, FACTTrans[Date].Month on Columns, and the measure "Expected Result" created on Step 5 in the "Values" section of the matrix to get the following result.
The major difference between the earlier solution and this is that the earlier one is relying on calculated tables and calculated columns created using DAX and the result is stored in the data model in a separate table. But in this case, the result is calculated using only a measure without the need for any calculated table or calculated columns except for the bridge table in many to many relationship. We could have avoided the bridge table also, but it will make the measure more complicated.
You may try both approaches in your data model and use "Performance Analyser" to evaluate and compare the performance between both the approaches and its difference will be evident if you use a really large dataset. It is up to you to decide between the two approaches.
- Anonymous6 years agoNot applicable
Just awesome, thanks a lot 🐵