Forum Discussion
Slicer filtering another Slicer
Anonymous
I can assure you that if you keep both in the same table, slicers attached to Area and Sub-Area will be cross-filtering each other without any other setup. This is, as I said, due to how auto-exists works. However, for this to work you only have to keep the combinations of (area, sub-area) that are not empty, meaning a combination must have at least one entry in the fact table. If you have empty combinations, they WILL show up. If this is the case, the only other good solution is a simple measure that will filter one of the slicers through the Filter Pane based on the selections made in the other slicer. This could, in fact, work both ways for both slicers at the same time. The solution with a filtering measure does not require keeping the combinations in one table.
Take a look at model:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AmzyDwofiLHinFExd83TORK8CVq3?e=1BNpFI
It should work, I know that, but it's always showing those "ghost" results.
- PaulDBrown5 years ago
Community Champion
Anonymous
Which "ghost results"? The way the model is set up, the slicer hierarchy works
- Anonymous5 years agoNot applicable
Did you try it Paul?
When I use it on my computer, everytime I change the Area, all the SubAreas that were not selected are "transported" into the the new Area SubArea's list. And when I click them, they disappear.