Slicer In Table A filters Table B based on multiple conditions

[Anonymous]

So i have 'Table A', which is a list of unique customers. Table B is the total inventory, and a different column for each customer. If a customers column has the value '1', that means that the customer is eligable to purchase the product.

I want to put Table A into a slicer, so that when a selection is made then Table B will filter for total inventory that those customers are eligable for. I must be able to select multiple customers in the slicer. I don't see a straight forward way to do this since a give row in Table B can be eligable for multiple customers. I also need to be able to filter for all customers so that it shows total inventory 

I tried to accomplish this using a switch function, but i'm only able to select one customer at a time.

Table A

my Slicer Values

Customer A

Customer B

Customer C

Customer D

Customer E

Table B

Product	Total_Inventory	customerA	customerB	customerC	customerD	customerE
Hamburger	1	0	1	1	1	1
Hot Dog	1	1	0	1	1	1
French Fries	1	0	1	1	1	1
Soda	1	1	0	1	0	1
Cheese Burger	1	0	1	1	1	1
Ice Cream	1	1	0	0	1	1
Cake	1	0	1	0	1	1
Candy Bar	1	1	0	0	0	1
Sausage	1	0	1	0	1	1

[jdbuchanan71]

@Anonymous 

You are going to want to unpivot table B so you have customers in a column.  Then you can join your customer table into the inventory table using the customer ID.

Product	Customer	Inventory
Hamburger	A	0
Hot Dog	A	1
French Fries	A	0
Soda	A	1
Cheese Burger	A	0
Ice Cream	A	1
Cake	A	0
Candy Bar	A	1
Sausage	A	0
Hamburger	B	1
Hot Dog	B	0
French Fries	B	1
Soda	B	0
Cheese Burger	B	1
Ice Cream	B	0
Cake	B	1
Candy Bar	B	0
Sausage	B	1

[Anonymous]

The data then wouldn't aggregate correctly though. It would show more inventory than is truly available if more than one customer is selected.

For example, a single hot dog in the warehouse can be available to multiple customers (although not all customers). if i unpivot the data the report will show that there is more hot dogs in our inventory than are truly available in the warehouse.

[dax]

Hi @Anonymous , 

I am not sure your requirement, you could referto my sample for details. If this is not waht you want, please correct me and inform me your expected output.

Best Regards,
Zoe Zhi

If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

[Anonymous]

I need a single column in the matrix that displays counts available inventory. This column must filter for the selected customers (whether it be a single, multiple, or all customers).

[jdbuchanan71]

You are probably going to need something like this where the total inventory lives on the products table.

Then you can write an inventory amount measure to check if there is a single customer selected and if not sum off the total inventory rather than the customer inventory.

Inventory Amount = 
IF ( HASONEVALUE ( Customers[Customer] ), SUM ( 'Customer Inventory'[Inventory] ), SUM ( Products[Inventory] ) )

[Anonymous]

I've already done something like this. I am able to have either one or all customers selected. However this won't work if multiple (but not all) customers are selected from what i can tell. 

[dax]

Hi @Anonymous , 

Did you refer to my sample? it could work when you select multiple customers, and the Total column will show the status of storage. If this is not what you want, please correct me and inform me more detailed infromation(your expected output).

Best Regards,
Zoe Zhi

If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

[Anonymous]

Your sample was close to what i needed but the grand total column isn't showing accurate aggregations. I only need the grand total column to work. (not the grand total of rows)

[dax]

Hi @Anonymous ,

If possible, could you please inform me your expected output(grand total )? In  my logic, when grand total =1, it represents that it have storage.

Best Regards,
Zoe Zhi

If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

[Anonymous]

My data is structured differently than the example you attached. The formula doen't work. In my case i cannot restructure the data