Starting December 3, join live sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started
Learn moreGet certified in Microsoft Fabric—for free! For a limited time, get a free DP-600 exam voucher to use by the end of 2024. Register now
Hit Reply to tell us what you think about the new On-Object Interaction feature so we can continue to improve.
For example:
Thanks,
-Power BI team
To read more about the feature, see the announcement in the Power BI Product Blog or our documentation on how to Use on-object interaction
FAQs:
The panes keep on disappearing.
Too many clicks in the new experience.
Turned off. Fourth month in a row....
Hi with the object oriented interface i cannot enable "Show values of selected filed" whith a slicer, I use this with a parameter field to select which fields will be presented on the matrix that i have.
I need to switch back to the old version to enable it....
Maybe is just me that cant find where is the equivalent
It should still be available on right click for the parameter
Thanks works like a charm, I was fixated that should be on the expansion arrow...
Where it should be.
But in general it seems much better than in the beginning 🙂 keep working on it, but it is not ready to be implemented yet.
Too much confusing.... add more click just to change from date hierachy visual to be general format...
consumed too much space in my mornitor just want to recheck which data I selected to the visual.
I understand it takes time to get used to a new way of working but this is just less efficient. I understand that it might be a little more intuitive but there are just more clicks needed to add data fields to a visual.
I tested the new August update which brought several improvements, I liked some of them, but I had to disable them in order to be able to perform my work, I believe there is still a long way to go for the new method to replace the current standard (I hope the two methods remain at the end for user choice).
Some improvements and fixes to be made:
1. Collapse the menus in one click (as in the default and not open a menu with several options);
2. No Ctrl+Click to open and pin a menu, just a click (reducing the number of clicks should be the goal for it to be viable);
3. Correct the bug: when a menu is closed and you want to open it by clicking on the icon (without ctrl+click) instead of opening it, all the other menus that are still open are closed.
I am not a fan of this. It's annoying. Please make it optional and not the default. The old way was better. In my experience of training new analysts, I feel this option has made the learning curve that much more worse to climb.
I've had to disable it, too awkward.
Main issue: Data field width too narrow and unadjustable.
Also;
1. Annoying to add a data field and then have to shift it from the bottom of the list to where I want it to be. In the old version, I could
2. Annoying to have to search in a separate list, rather than just have the field list and drag onto the viz pane.
Hi,
regarding the new feature "On-object format subselections now supported in spotlight and focus mode", I think there is a bug :
I select the Format from elipse button (top-rigth of the visual), Then the Format pane is appear :
I click the cross icon on the pane and close it :
Now when I Focus on the visual (by clicking the Focus Mode), It show me the "Exit format mode" without the format pane :
best regards
Mahyar
I do not like. I remove this options from PBI.
I have tried to give the feature a fair shake. Removing the pane itself is the most annoying part. I wish the visual pane was still available along with the On-Object interaction.
It takes too much time to hover over an object, click the icon and then start dropping in data. It is much faster if the panes can be opened side by side.
I have tried this many times - turned it on after each update, then turned it back off within the same day because I got frustrated. I know additional changes are coming, and perhaps at some point this will be an acceptable feature for me. But honestly, if this is the only option for change - I would rather it be left alone. I understand that you're trying to make it more like the Excel experience, not sure that is the best choice here. As many others have said, please keep listening to the community - forcing change is not always a good option.
More clicks in the design process isn't needed, and this doesn't solve the 'where can I find x feature problem' either. I think the best solution for that would be to move the visual design features to the ribbon.
Other options could be:
1. keep the panes we have - but let us undock and move them away from the side panel (even outside of the design window!)
2. ditch the panes, put the design detail onto the ribbon - there's LOTS of real-estate there, and drop-downs are more intuitive in that area.
3. a few of the changes - like adding text header information might make sense to have on-object, but we don't need to have EVERYTHING there.
I agree. If the amount of developer effort that was being assigned to this feature was directed to refining/fixing the existing UI we would all be way better off.
I agree
Oh my goodness, yes. Or rather put, if the CAT Team were engaged and helped to put commonsense into this in the same way they envisioned Fabric....., and if Satya himself said look what awesomeness we have for you. We care about the Makers, the Admins, the Business users, and envision a way to help you all to have a better experience and outshine Tableau and Google. Maybe then I would believe in this. But no.
I would like to know if is possible to create acumulate value in the matrix, but with Product Name and acumulate values in the vertical and dates (by day) in horizontal
I need to do acumulated value by day, but like it.
Starting December 3, join live sessions with database experts and the Fabric product team to learn just how easy it is to get started.
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early Bird pricing ends December 9th.
User | Count |
---|---|
92 | |
86 | |
85 | |
66 | |
49 |
User | Count |
---|---|
140 | |
113 | |
106 | |
64 | |
60 |