Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
Sign up nowGet Fabric certified for FREE! Don't miss your chance! Learn more
Hi all,
I've this measure (last column)
and this is the code of the measure:
If somebody can give me help or give some idea ... it will be appreciated
Solved! Go to Solution.
If can be useful for someone, this is my solution:
If can be useful for someone, this is my solution:
@DiePic Yep, you got it, would be the equivalent of this using a more generalized method (below). Also, you might consider using DISTINCT instead of VALUES. VALUES has a nasty habit of returning a blank row when you have unmatched keys in a relationship.
SUMX( SUMMARIZE('table', [id], "__MyMeasure", [MyMeasure]), [MyMeasure] )
The advantage of this generalized approach is that one, SUMMARIZE tends to be crazy fast. Two, if you need to "group" by more than one thing, SUMMARIZE can do this while just using DISTINCT or VALUES cannot.
@DiePic This looks like a measure aggregation problem. See my blog article about that here: https://community.powerbi.com/t5/Community-Blog/Design-Pattern-Groups-and-Super-Groups/ba-p/138149
The pattern is:
MinScoreMeasure = MINX ( SUMMARIZE ( Table, Table[Group] , "Measure",[YourMeasure] ), [Measure])
MaxScoreMeasure = MAXX ( SUMMARIZE ( Table, Table[Group] , "Measure",[YourMeasure] ), [Measure])
AvgScoreMeasure = AVERAGEX ( SUMMARIZE ( Table, Table[Group] , "Measure",[YourMeasure] ), [Measure])
etc.
Hi @Greg_Deckler thank you for your suggestion.
This is really over my knowledge ... can you help me more please?
I try:
If you love stickers, then you will definitely want to check out our Community Sticker Challenge!
Check out the January 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 65 | |
| 65 | |
| 45 | |
| 21 | |
| 18 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 115 | |
| 114 | |
| 38 | |
| 36 | |
| 26 |