Starting December 3, join live sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started
Learn moreShape the future of the Fabric Community! Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions. Take survey.
Hello Community,
i've got a problem with dimensional aggregation using a tabular model in SSAS. I have a star-schema, where fact is linked to serveral dimensions. The lowest level of time is Month ( linked to DIM via Month_ID). Now when calculating the sum for costs in several years the timedimension is not aggregating for example years. PBI doubles years for any month in filtercontext:
I never experienced something like that with other models of SSAS tabular. When searching the cube in SSMS AS and do the same query, it is aggregating years. Any suggestions?
Edit: I think any aggregation of dimensional values in this model behave this way...
SQL Analysis Server 13.0.5026.0
model level of compatibility: 1200
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hello @v-juanli-msft ,
the measure is defined by DAX (sum) in SSAS but its not the problem here. In the meantime I got a solution. The problem was the set sorting of Month and Year. It was sorted by day_ID, which meant that although the day is not on the report, each item is still calculated separately by day. I have now arranged the sort on the basis of fields of the same level, which solved the problem.
Nevertheless thanks for your will to help
Hi @Xriz
Is the "sum_CO_IST" measure created in Power BI or in SSAS?
How do you define it with DAX or MDX?
Best Regards
Maggie
Hello @v-juanli-msft ,
the measure is defined by DAX (sum) in SSAS but its not the problem here. In the meantime I got a solution. The problem was the set sorting of Month and Year. It was sorted by day_ID, which meant that although the day is not on the report, each item is still calculated separately by day. I have now arranged the sort on the basis of fields of the same level, which solved the problem.
Nevertheless thanks for your will to help
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
92 | |
85 | |
83 | |
49 |
User | Count |
---|---|
150 | |
142 | |
112 | |
73 | |
55 |