Forum Discussion

gbarr12345's avatar
gbarr12345
Post Prodigy
1 year ago
Solved

Relationship issue

Hi there,

 

I have data in excel that I've imported into Power BI.

 

The only issue is that both of the data is transactional data and I need them to connect.

 

The only relationship I can only do is a Many to Many which I know isn't reliable.

 

 

 

Can anybody help me in fixing the relationships please if possible?

 

I have attached the sample PBIX and sample data I created which mirrors the data I was provided (with different headings and numbers of course). Please see below:

 

PBIX - https://drive.google.com/file/d/10yZDO4Q7RqrIw02WPlZ0fglhcrtiMpCi/view?usp=drive_link

 

Excel - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ot6UL-7Hmbz0YHxxDhxSMaOMYyAKj3lb/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=116472822422825040168&rtpof=true&sd=true

  • Hi gbarr12345 

    o answer your question, it's necessary to understand the logic behind what you're trying to do, as it’s not clear at this moment.

    On a technical level, the tables appear to have the same structure, so it’s unclear why you’re not performing a union (combining them vertically with a classified column if they represent different actions). The many-to-many relationships that have been created are due to the lack of a unique key for each table. Technically, you could address this by creating a bridge table, but that’s only part of the solution, as it’s not clear what you’re trying to achieve logically.

    More information about many-to-many and bridges tables is here :

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPLaun-tTgQ

    If this post helps, then please consider Accepting it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly

3 Replies

  • Hi gbarr12345 

    o answer your question, it's necessary to understand the logic behind what you're trying to do, as it’s not clear at this moment.

    On a technical level, the tables appear to have the same structure, so it’s unclear why you’re not performing a union (combining them vertically with a classified column if they represent different actions). The many-to-many relationships that have been created are due to the lack of a unique key for each table. Technically, you could address this by creating a bridge table, but that’s only part of the solution, as it’s not clear what you’re trying to achieve logically.

    More information about many-to-many and bridges tables is here :

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPLaun-tTgQ

    If this post helps, then please consider Accepting it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly