Check your eligibility for this 50% exam voucher offer and join us for free live learning sessions to get prepared for Exam DP-700.
Get StartedDon't miss out! 2025 Microsoft Fabric Community Conference, March 31 - April 2, Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount. Prices go up February 11th. Register now.
Hello Community,
I have the following problem and can't get any further.
I have a slicer for tags that filters two tables TagTable 1 and Tagtable 2.
Here is the model view.
If I filter a value that is in TagTable 1, I get 0,00 Euro for my costs.
But if I filter a value from TagTable 2 I get the correct value in my view.
See the two pictures.
Top photo Tagtable 1 and bottom photo Tagtable 2.
However, if I delete or deactivate the relationship of tagtable2 to the fact table and then select a tag in the slicer that is in tagtable1 again, I also get the correct result.
See picture.
What is my problem here?
I don't quite understand this and would like some help.
Many thanks in advance.
spaceman127
Hey spaceman,
can you pls try to connect your dimTagtable1 directly to your factTable. Like you did with your dimTagtable2.
It looks like your dimAzResources does not filter your factTable properly.
Try to establish a direct conncetion between tagtable1 and factTable.
Gutes Gelingen 🙂
Hello sergej_og,
Unfortunately this does not work.
Unfortunately I cannot activate this relationship and I have already tried. It's in German but I don't think that's a problem.
Enclosed is a photo.
Greetings,
spaceman127
Hey spaceman,
in german, no problem. 🙂
bi direktional geht nicht, das leuchtet mir ein. Da gibt es in dem Fall paar Problemchen.
Muss es bi-diektional sein?
Wenn du auf single direction umstellst (Tagtable1 filtert factTable) sollte eher passen.
Was passiert, wenn du es so machst?
Hey sergej_og,
kann auch gerne weiter in englisch bleiben.
Wenn ich die Filterung so ändere kann ich diese auch nicht aktivieren. Führt dann zu einer Mehrdeutigkeit.
Hier das Bild.
Viele Grüße
spaceman127
hmm, ok.
a bit difficult to "debug" from far away.
Looks like you have to invest a bit time in datamodelling.
ok.
I also think I need to work on it again.
User | Count |
---|---|
117 | |
73 | |
58 | |
49 | |
48 |
User | Count |
---|---|
171 | |
122 | |
60 | |
59 | |
56 |