Forum Discussion
Power Query vs. Aggregating in Power BI: Issue or bug?
- 3 years ago
With hundredths of a second apart it will depend on the format used and you may need to convert it to use it the visual correctly. The solution here might help:
Power Query will work a lot better with this without any additional formatting for a visual so i'd recommend using the aggregation there.
If I answered your question, please mark my post as solution, Appreciate your Kudos 👍
These are the first 20 entries. Names are fake and emails redacted, but the "Lookup" column reflects a quick MATCH between what the aggregated table produces in Power Query and what I get when I use the aggregation in the visual (count distinct) and then filter the visual to give me anybody with a logon count of < 5. The only thing I can think of that causes this is that Power BI for some reason cannot discern between hundredths of a second when doing the count. The entries that are missing are people that have logons literally one right after the other, a hundredth of a second apart. Thoughts?
+-------------+--------------+-------------------------+-------+--------+
| First Name | Last Name | Username | Count | Lookup |
+-------------+--------------+-------------------------+-------+--------+
| Allen | Flores | [email protected] | 3 | #N/A |
| Alyssa | Poole | [email protected] | 1 | 1 |
| Bobbi | Karpus | [email protected] | 1 | #N/A |
| Brandie | Rucker | [email protected] | 1 | 2 |
| Brent | Strachan | [email protected] | 1 | #N/A |
| Brian | Olesko | [email protected] | 3 | 4 |
| Bruce | Marshall | [email protected] | 3 | 5 |
| Bryan | Holt | [email protected] | 1 | #N/A |
| Bryan | Stuehrenberg | [email protected] | 2 | #N/A |
| Cami | Hunt | [email protected] | 1 | 6 |
| Chris | Ginest | [email protected] | 1 | 7 |
| Christopher | Tulga | [email protected] | 3 | 8 |
| Courtney | Chafer | [email protected] | 2 | 9 |
| Courtney | Watson | [email protected] | 1 | #N/A |
| Dana | Bower | [email protected] | 1 | 10 |
| Daniel | Jasak | [email protected] | 3 | 12 |
| Daniel | Kozlowski | [email protected] | 4 | 13 |
| Daryl | Marske | [email protected] | 3 | 14 |
| David | Lee | [email protected] | 2 | 15 |
| Derek | Russell | [email protected] | 4 | 16 |
+-------------+--------------+-------------------------+-------+--------+
With hundredths of a second apart it will depend on the format used and you may need to convert it to use it the visual correctly. The solution here might help:
Power Query will work a lot better with this without any additional formatting for a visual so i'd recommend using the aggregation there.
If I answered your question, please mark my post as solution, Appreciate your Kudos 👍
- SDittmannFleet3 years agoAdvocate IV
The dates are all formatted as "General Date" or "Date/time". I'll simply keep this at the back of my head that there may be issues and assume that what I can do in Power Query takes precedence. Thanks!