Starting December 3, join live sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started
Learn moreShape the future of the Fabric Community! Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions. Take survey.
Hi community,
Two questions I'm having trouble with
I have a financial statement the Description in the table come from an Dim account
The amount comes from the FACT table
Everything is connected well
the problem
1. I would like a certain account to bring me a plus amount and another account to bring me a minus amount
For example Revenues will be positive
And FEE will be negative
I have a hard time doing this
2. I would like to determine the order of the sections in the visual
Regolar solutions don't work for me because each section comes from a different place in the account hierarchy
I would appreciate your help!
Thanks
Link for exmple my case
https://1drv.ms/f/s!AonyYI-TdspHgUhwngZ6OKvpnSsc
1. Add a calculated column that inverts the sign for the fees but keeps it for the revenues
2. Create a reference table with the sections and their desired sort order as an index. Then use "Sort one column by another column"
The fact table seems to be missing the account reference?
Hi @lbendlin
I am trying to create a correct plus and minus sign in my numbers
I have an agg(+,-) column where the signs are correct
And I have an Amount column.
Because when I multiply between them something falls
The logic of the measure says Amount * Agg (column sign)
The rest of the formula is ignoring other filters
Please update your sample file with the account reference.
updated
+ column Agg(+,-) in Dim Account
Thanks
fact table is still empty
Sori,
updated
Please provide sanitized sample data that fully covers your issue.
Please show the expected outcome based on the sample data you provided.
Unfortunately your sample data is still not in a usable shape.
You also seem to expect to be able to use data from different levels of the hierarchy. While that is possible it will make the measure very complex as you will have to account for all hierarchy level scenarios separately to avoid double counting. You may want to rethink that process.
Hi @lbendlin
Sorry for the delay and the mess
I really didn't specify the data a bit because I thought I would get a general direction
But thanks for the answer and the desire to help
I have attached in the link both a PBIX file and a detailed Excel file that contains my example
Unfortunately, the data is sensitive and it is difficult for me to prepare an example case
I will send you another message regarding this matter
Beyond that, I think that the sample data will be able to give a clearer direction this time
https://1drv.ms/f/s!AonyYI-TdspHgUhwngZ6OKvpnSsc
expected outcome:
What you see in the Visual sheet in Excel
Thanks!
Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions.
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
92 | |
84 | |
82 | |
49 |
User | Count |
---|---|
145 | |
142 | |
111 | |
71 | |
55 |