Forum Discussion
Multi-source Reconciliation
Hi,
To start with, share 3 tables and for those tables, show the expected result. Share the 3 tables in a format that can be pasted in an MS Excel file.
Hi, thank you for your quick response. Since I unfortunately cannot drop Excel files here, I will use the available table function.
Table 1 is from the perspective of organizational unit A:
| Reported by | Document type | Document Number | Document Date | Amount | Towards Partner |
| A | Receivable | 11 | 01.01.2024 | 5.000 | X |
| A | Receivable | 55 | 01.01.2024 | 10.000 | X |
| A | Payable | 999 | 01.01.2024 | 50.000 | X |
Table 2 is from the perspective of organizational unit B:
| Reported by | Document type | Document Number | Document Date | Amount | Towards Partner |
| B | Payable | 44 | 01.01.2024 | 30.000 | A |
| B | Payable | 90 | 01.01.2024 | 12.000 | X |
| B | Receivable | 80 | 01.01.2024 | 12.000 | X |
Table 3 is from the perspective of organizational unit X:
| Reported by | Document type | Document Number | Document Date | Amount | Towards Partner |
| X | Payable | 11 | 01.01.2024 | 5.000 | A |
| X | Payable | 55 | 01.01.2024 | 10.000 | A |
| X | Receivable | 999 | 01.01.2024 | 50.000 | A |
| X | Receivable | 12 | 01.01.2024 | 20.000 | B |
That's the starting point. The result should be divided into 2 tables, Table "Consistent" and Table "Inconsistent".
Tabelle Consistent:
| Voting partner 1 | Voting partner 2 | Conclusion |
| A | X | no deviation |
Tabelle Inconsistent:
| Voting partner 1 | Voting partner 2 | Document Number | Magnitude of deviation |
| A | B | 44 | 30.000 |
| B | X | 90 | 12.000 |
| B | X | 80 | 12.000 |
| B | X | 12 | 20.000 |
Ideally, a filter card should be created for the last two tables, in which one can select both voting partners and then see all transactions between them.
Thank you in advance!
- Ashish_Mathur2 years agoSuper User
I really cannot understand your requirement. Someone else will help you.