Forum Discussion
Missed icons for table conditional formatting
Hi Anonymous ,
You can use the IF statement to nest, and change the measure: "% CT 2 with area" in the previous demo to the following formula：
% CT 2 with area = IF ( ISINSCOPE ( 'Table (2)'[ Area] ), DIVIDE ( SUM ( 'Table (2)'[Qty] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( 'Table (2)'[Qty] ), ALLSELECTED ( 'Table (2)'[ Area] ) ) ), DIVIDE ( SUM ( 'Table (2)'[Qty] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( 'Table (2)'[Qty] ), ALLSELECTED ( 'Table (2)'[MercatoAgente] ) ) ) )Best Regards,
Community Support Team _ Joey
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Thank you v-joesh-msft
Now something is brighter to me, but I still have some issue.
This image shows the table when you use RT measure, it's your 3rd example. Why is 205.225 green? It should be based on percentage based on total (638.310), so it should be red because it's under 50%.
Then, this image shows the table where you used TC (1st example). Why is it all in green? It is based on the column total, so considering SHOP I would expect 668 to be red and 2.580 to be green, related to their column total of 3.248.
Right here, instead, with row total is looks fine, because even with drill down it's green if the value is above 50% of the row total.
Thanks
Solution SageHi Anonymous ,
Sorry I made a mistake, you need to set the rules to Number and modify the corresponding value, just like the answer in the first question. The setting of RT/CT/GT is all the same：
Best Regards,
Community Support Team _ Joey
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Thank you v-joesh-msft
With your hint the example with GT works fine, even if it's weird to see it working while has different conditional formatting settings than RT visual.
Instead, visual with CT is not fine: all the icons stay green! I thought I could need to add Area field (I am drilling down from MercatoAgente to Area) to the ALLSELECTED function in CT measure, but doing it something strange happens:
Some icon colors are good, but why are 2.580 or 200.200 red??
Thanks
- v-joesh-msft
Hi @ nick93,
I found the formula used in the first answer:：RT with ALLSELECTED('Table')，GT with ALLSELECTED('Table'[Type]) may be confusing, using RT with ALLSELECTED('Table'[Type]), GT with ALLSELECTED('Table') might make a better understanding. RT refers to row total, and GT refers to grand total.
When you add a new field to the row of the matrix, the row context will also change. I have made some examples and hope to have a more intuitive understanding;
1: There is only one field in MercatoAgente in Rows:
2: There are two fields MercatoAgente and Area in Rows:
(1) Presentation of CT/RT/GT:
(2) Presentation of different Rows references in ALLSELECTED:
Looking at the rendering of each of the different fields in the screenshot, you may find the difference and find the result you want.
Here is a demo , please try it：
Best Regards,
Community Support Team _ Joey
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.Hi v-joesh-msft and thank you one more time
Ok, it looks fine, now all what you explained me works.
I have just one last doubt: my aim was to create a conditional formatting which worked fine both if I didn't drill the table down and stayed at MercatoAgente level and if I drilled it down to Area. I would like to create a single measure which formats the table as you see in the following images: in image1 the total to choose the icons should be the column total, in image2 icons should be based on the column total of each MercatoAgente class, and not the whole total.
Image 1: here the ALLSELECTED function contains MercatoAgente
Image 2: here the ALLSELECTED function contains Area
I thought I could create a table formatted this way with a single measure. Is it possible?
Thank you again