Forum Discussion
Matrix Table Drill Down
I am working on a matrix table to display the budget and actual data.
Budget and actual data are from two separate fact tables, they are relationship with region dimension table. However, budget and actual fact data is against different dimensions. Please refer to below tables
Budget table:
Country / Province / City / District / Amount
| China | Liaoning | 900 | ||
| China | Liaoning | 901 | ||
| China | Liaoning | 902 | ||
| China | Liaoning | 903 | ||
| China | Heilongjiang | 904 | ||
| China | Jilin | 905 | ||
| China | Beijing | 906 | ||
| China | Tianjing | 907 | ||
| China | Hebei | 908 | ||
| China | Henan | 909 | ||
| China | Shanxi | 910 | ||
| China | Shandong | 911 | ||
| China | Guangxi | 912 | ||
| China | Guangdong | 913 | ||
| China | Guangdong | 914 |
Actual Table
Country / Province / City / District / Amount
| China | Liaoning | ShengYang | YuHong | 500 |
| China | Liaoning | ShengYang | Shenhe | 501 |
| China | Liaoning | Dalian | Ganjingzi | 502 |
| China | Liaoning | Dalian | Shahekou | 503 |
| China | Heilongjiang | Haerbin | District8 | 504 |
| China | Jilin | ChangChun | District7 | 505 |
| China | Beijing | Beijing | District6 | 506 |
| China | Tianjing | Tianjing | District5 | 507 |
| China | Hebei | Shijiazhuang | District4 | 508 |
| China | Henan | Zhengzhou | District3 | 509 |
| China | Shanxi | Xian | District2 | 510 |
| China | Shandong | Jinan | District1 | 511 |
| China | Guangxi | Nanning | District0 | 512 |
| China | Guangdong | Guangzhou | YueXiu | 513 |
| China | Guangdong | Guangzhou | Tianhe | 514 |
Dimension Table
Country / Province / City / District /
| China | Liaoning | ShengYang | YuHong |
| China | Liaoning | ShengYang | Shenhe |
| China | Liaoning | Dalian | Ganjingzi |
| China | Liaoning | Dalian | Shahekou |
| China | Heilongjiang | Haerbin | District8 |
| China | Jilin | ChangChun | District7 |
| China | Beijing | Beijing | District6 |
| China | Tianjing | Tianjing | District5 |
| China | Hebei | Shijiazhuang | District4 |
| China | Henan | Zhengzhou | District3 |
| China | Shanxi | Xian | District2 |
| China | Shandong | Jinan | District1 |
| China | Guangxi | Nanning | District0 |
| China | Guangdong | Guangzhou | YueXiu |
| China | Guangdong | Guangzhou | Tianhe |
I need a matrix table to display amount data can be drilled down from Country to District
1) when I drill down to provice level, the data looks fine
2) when I drill down to city level, for Budget since it is managed on province level, in the case that one provide has multiple cities, each city is showing the same amount with province level in the matrix table. Which is quite confusion, when I drill down to district level, it is the same bad looking.
Is there a workaround to show the matrix like below ?
The requirement is if the fact table data is not maintained in the give dimension, then the value in the table for the dimension row should display as "-" or display blank is fine either.
Hi WendyDUFE ,
Try this:
Measure = VAR Value_ = SWITCH ( TRUE (), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[District] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[District], 'Dimension'[District] ) ), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[City] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[City], 'Dimension'[City] ) ), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[Province] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[Province], 'Dimension'[Province] ) ), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[Country] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[Country], 'Dimension'[Country] ) ) ) RETURN IF ( ISBLANK ( Value_ ), "-", Value_ )Best Regards,
Icey
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi WendyDUFE ,
Try this:
Budget Amount = VAR Value_ = SWITCH ( TRUE (), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[District] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[District], 'Dimension'[District] ) ), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[City] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[City], 'Dimension'[City] ) ), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[Province] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[Province], 'Dimension'[Province] ) ), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[Country] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[Country], 'Dimension'[Country] ) ), SUM ( Budget[Amount] ) // ----------------added--------------------------// ) RETURN IF ( ISBLANK ( Value_ ), "-", Value_ )Best Regards,
Icey
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
5 Replies
- FarhanAhmed
Community Champion
You can create your Budget Measure to include "ISINSCOPE" to exclude calculations on particular Column/Hierarchy
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dax/isinscope-function-dax
https://www.kasperonbi.com/use-isinscope-to-get-the-right-hierarchy-level-in-dax/
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/distinguishing-hasonevalue-from-isinscope/
- WendyDUFE
Helper III
Hi FarhanAhmed
I refered to this method ( https://www.kasperonbi.com/use-isinscope-to-get-the-right-hierarchy-level-in-dax/)to make adjustment, and finally got a matrix table as below:
In the fact table, if the data is associated with district dimension, then the city and province level matrix table will not do the summarization and display the total amount of district, do you know how to solve this ? It is supposed to have the upper level hierachy summerize the lower hierachy's amount, right ?
- Icey
Community Support
Hi WendyDUFE ,
Try this:
Measure = VAR Value_ = SWITCH ( TRUE (), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[District] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[District], 'Dimension'[District] ) ), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[City] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[City], 'Dimension'[City] ) ), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[Province] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[Province], 'Dimension'[Province] ) ), ISINSCOPE ( 'Dimension'[Country] ), CALCULATE ( SUM ( Budget[Amount] ), USERELATIONSHIP ( Budget[Country], 'Dimension'[Country] ) ) ) RETURN IF ( ISBLANK ( Value_ ), "-", Value_ )Best Regards,
Icey
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.