Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!Learn from the best! Meet the four finalists headed to the FINALS of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships! Register now
Hi,
in order to rationalize the columns for the tables of a PBI data model, how is better managing GUID columns?
For fact tables it's good to avoid to have these key columns in the model, but for dimension tables?
Thanks
HI @Anonymous,
Actually, M query has it owner guid function. If you not want to use original guid who stored in your database, you can try to create temporary guid by above function.
Notice: Lazy evaluation will effect above method to generate guid(same guid), if you can please use above function in table to instead list.
List, Record, and Table member expressions, as well as let expressions (See Expressions, values, and let expression), are evaluated using lazy evaluation: they are evaluated when needed. All other expressions are evaluated using eager evaluation: they are evaluated immediately, when encountered during the evaluation process. A good way to think about this is to remember that evaluating a list or record expression will return a list or record value that knows how its list items or record fields need to computed, when requested (by lookup or index operators).
Regards,
Xiaoxin Sheng
Hi,
I'm searching the best practice to manage GUID columns read from a data source in order to reduce the occupied space in memory.
Think about a GUID column with more and more distinct values.
Thanks
HI @Anonymous,
Current I haven't found any effective solution to cutdown the cost of guid.
Maybe you can try to use identity column to achieve unique id.
Regards,
Xiaoxin Sheng
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
Check out the February 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 53 | |
| 51 | |
| 36 | |
| 15 | |
| 14 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 92 | |
| 75 | |
| 41 | |
| 26 | |
| 25 |