Join us for an expert-led overview of the tools and concepts you'll need to pass exam PL-300. The first session starts on June 11th. See you there!
Get registeredPower BI is turning 10! Let’s celebrate together with dataviz contests, interactive sessions, and giveaways. Register now.
In what order occurs catalog? Here I present what I needed to make
Date | Katalog | result |
2017-02-05 10:45:00 | 10000 | 1 |
2017-02-05 23:16:00 | 10000 | 2 |
2017-02-06 23:06:00 | 50000 | 1 |
2017-02-07 17:06:00 | 50001 | 1 |
2017-02-07 17:06:00 | 8000 | 1 |
2017-02-08 14:51:00 | 400 | 1 |
2017-02-09 11:00:00 | 10000 | 3 |
2017-02-09 11:00:00 | 50000 | 2 |
The number 10000 in the column Occurs as one in the sequence
If it meets another number 10000 will already be in the order of 2
thank you for answer
Solved! Go to Solution.
Oops....
Below alternative code that looks more complicated, but in a test with 10,000 rows it completed in a few seconds while the original solution ran for a few minutes...
Remark: contrary to the previous solution, these are all standard UI steps (except that I renamed every step), with only rather basic formulas entered in the 2 "AddColumn" steps.
OriginalSort = Table.AddIndexColumn(PreviousStep, "OriginalSort", 1, 1), SortedOnKatalog = Table.Sort(OriginalSort,{{"Katalog", Order.Ascending}, {"OriginalSort", Order.Ascending}}), Index0Added = Table.AddIndexColumn(SortedOnKatalog, "Index", 0, 1), Index1Added = Table.AddIndexColumn(Index0Added, "Index.1", 1, 1), Merged = Table.NestedJoin(Index1Added,{"Index"},Index1Added,{"Index.1"},"Prev",JoinKind.LeftOuter), PrevKatalog = Table.ExpandTableColumn(Merged, "Prev", {"Katalog"}, {"Prev.Katalog"}), IndicesRemoved = Table.RemoveColumns(PrevKatalog,{"Index", "Index.1"}), NewIndex0Added = Table.AddIndexColumn(IndicesRemoved, "Index", 0, 1), StartIndex = Table.AddColumn(NewIndex0Added, "StartIndex", each if [Katalog] <> [Prev.Katalog] or [Prev.Katalog] = null then [Index] else null), FilledDown = Table.FillDown(StartIndex,{"StartIndex"}), ResultAdded = Table.AddColumn(FilledDown, "Result", each 1 + [Index] - [StartIndex]), SortedOriginal = Table.Sort(ResultAdded,{{"OriginalSort", Order.Ascending}}), ColumnsRemoved = Table.RemoveColumns(SortedOriginal,{"OriginalSort", "Prev.Katalog", "Index", "StartIndex"})
You can use this code:
Indexed = Table.AddIndexColumn(PreviousStep, "Index", 0, 1), ResultAdded = Table.AddColumn(Indexed, "Result", (earlier) => List.Count(List.Select(List.Range(Indexed[Katalog],0,1+earlier[Index]),each _ =earlier[Katalog])))
OK, thank you helped. Please do not know how to accelerate the performance of Excel, after this operation takes too long to load, then the next command
Oops....
Below alternative code that looks more complicated, but in a test with 10,000 rows it completed in a few seconds while the original solution ran for a few minutes...
Remark: contrary to the previous solution, these are all standard UI steps (except that I renamed every step), with only rather basic formulas entered in the 2 "AddColumn" steps.
OriginalSort = Table.AddIndexColumn(PreviousStep, "OriginalSort", 1, 1), SortedOnKatalog = Table.Sort(OriginalSort,{{"Katalog", Order.Ascending}, {"OriginalSort", Order.Ascending}}), Index0Added = Table.AddIndexColumn(SortedOnKatalog, "Index", 0, 1), Index1Added = Table.AddIndexColumn(Index0Added, "Index.1", 1, 1), Merged = Table.NestedJoin(Index1Added,{"Index"},Index1Added,{"Index.1"},"Prev",JoinKind.LeftOuter), PrevKatalog = Table.ExpandTableColumn(Merged, "Prev", {"Katalog"}, {"Prev.Katalog"}), IndicesRemoved = Table.RemoveColumns(PrevKatalog,{"Index", "Index.1"}), NewIndex0Added = Table.AddIndexColumn(IndicesRemoved, "Index", 0, 1), StartIndex = Table.AddColumn(NewIndex0Added, "StartIndex", each if [Katalog] <> [Prev.Katalog] or [Prev.Katalog] = null then [Index] else null), FilledDown = Table.FillDown(StartIndex,{"StartIndex"}), ResultAdded = Table.AddColumn(FilledDown, "Result", each 1 + [Index] - [StartIndex]), SortedOriginal = Table.Sort(ResultAdded,{{"OriginalSort", Order.Ascending}}), ColumnsRemoved = Table.RemoveColumns(SortedOriginal,{"OriginalSort", "Prev.Katalog", "Index", "StartIndex"})
OK, thank you working fine, you knew this next adjustment?
Table 1
Date | Katalog | piece | result |
2017-02-05 10:45:00 | 10000 | 1 | 1 |
2017-02-05 23:16:00 | 10000 | 4 | 2 |
2017-02-06 23:06:00 | 50000 | 1 | 1 |
2017-02-07 17:06:00 | 50001 | 2 | 1 |
2017-02-07 17:06:00 | 8000 | 1 | 1 |
2017-02-08 14:51:00 | 400 | 3 | 1 |
2017-02-09 11:00:00 | 10000 | 1 | 3 |
2017-02-09 11:00:00 | 50000 | 1 | 2 |
Table 2
Katalog | Stock | Result(1) – (if Table1[Katalog] = Table2[Katalog] and Table1[result1] = 1 Then Table1[piece]) | Result(2) – (if Table1[Katalog] = Table2[Katalog] and Table1[result1] = 2 Then Table1[piece]) | Result(3) – (if Table1[Katalog] = Table2[Katalog] and Table1[result1] = 2 Then Table1[piece]) | Result(4) – (if Table1[Katalog] = Table2[Katalog] and Table1[result1] = 2 Then Table1[piece]) |
400 | 5 | 3 |
|
|
|
8000 | 2 | 1 |
|
|
|
10000 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
|
50000 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
|
50001 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
No, I didn't know and I don't understand either, but it looks like a pivot table.
This is your chance to engage directly with the engineering team behind Fabric and Power BI. Share your experiences and shape the future.
Check out the June 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
81 | |
76 | |
61 | |
37 | |
33 |
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
56 | |
51 | |
42 | |
40 |