Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now! Learn more
Hello guys, I am having an issue with some dynamic filtering on a table, and I am asking for your help to make this work.
So here is the problem described:
I have a Table A, for which I am applying 2 different filtering measures:
Measure 1 = Calculate(DistinctCount(Table A [col X], Filter(Table A, expression 1)));
Measure 2 = Calculate(DistinctCount(Table A [col X], Filter(Table A, expression 2)));
What I would like to do:
Measure 3 = Calculate(DistinctCount(Table A [col X], Append(Filter 1 Result, Filter 2 Result)); - or something like this.
The reason I want to do this:
I have to count the distinct value from both of the result sets and I cannot reunite the logic inside expression 1 and 2, and I am trying to rule out rows that could appear as a result for both expressions.
Am I overthinking something, or is there no way? If there is, can anyone suggest one please?
Solved! Go to Solution.
@v-chuncz-msft thank you for looking into my matters!
In the end I managed to get a solution to my problem. I had to use a function I've never used before, but it could be useful to anybody out there so I'm going to explain what I did:
I took the results from the two filterings and I assigned them to a VAR each using the CALCULATETABLE function. I then used the COUNTROWS function on a DISTINCT of the two VARs' UNION. It worked like a charm!
I hope this comes in handy to anyone out there! ![]()
@Anonymous,
It seems that you may simply use the logical OR operator (||).
@v-chuncz-msft, it would be really cool for it to be that easy, but the problem is that the 2 expressions are pointed at 2 different contexts of the same table:
M1's filter: Filter(All(Table A), expression 1)));
M2's filter: Filter(Table A, expression 2)));
Which means that for the expression 1 and 2, I cannot use a simple OR, because the ALL refers to the whole table, whereas the second refers to the selected values based on the filters set to a report level.
Or is there a way to implement an OR statement prior to that?
@Anonymous,
You may add UNION Function.
@v-chuncz-msft thank you for looking into my matters!
In the end I managed to get a solution to my problem. I had to use a function I've never used before, but it could be useful to anybody out there so I'm going to explain what I did:
I took the results from the two filterings and I assigned them to a VAR each using the CALCULATETABLE function. I then used the COUNTROWS function on a DISTINCT of the two VARs' UNION. It worked like a charm!
I hope this comes in handy to anyone out there! ![]()
The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now!
Check out the November 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 59 | |
| 43 | |
| 42 | |
| 23 | |
| 17 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 190 | |
| 122 | |
| 96 | |
| 66 | |
| 47 |