Forum Discussion
Hidden relationship?
- 6 years ago
the message actually says it quite clearly. Currently there is a following setup:
- 'queues' => 'systemusers'
- 'queues' => 'trs_tasktypes'=>'tasks'
so if you add 'systemusers'=>'tasks' then filter on 'queues' could follow 2 paths to filter 'tasks': either the path 2. or this one:
- 'queues' => 'systemusers'=>'tasks'
which causes the ambiguity. The question is which logic you want to implement. If it difers per case then you can activate the inactive relationship by using USERRLATIONSHIP, e.g. in CALCULATE https://dax.guide/userelationship/
more general info on relationships (around 14:30 Alberto starts talking about ambiguity):
https://www.sqlbi.com/tv/understanding-relationships-in-power-bi/
Hi Anonymous ,
I'm not certain whether your the scenario like this:
When you try to create active relationship between table and table2, it will show this message:
That could be there has indirectly relationships between these tables so that you should enable one of the relationship or change the Cross filter direction.
Please refer:
- https://radacad.com/what-is-the-direction-of-relationship-in-power-bi
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/desktop-bidirectional-filtering
If not like the previous scenario, could you please share more details about some pictures or error messages for further discussion?
Best Regards,
Yingjie Li
If this post helps then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.