Forum Discussion
Help with relationships
- 4 years ago
Sounds like in your Weights database that the Part Group is not unique. Best way to tell: Add that column THREE times to a table visual. Leave the first one as it is, change the aggregation of the second to DISTINCT COUNT, and change the aggregation of the third to COUNT. Now look at the bottom numbers. If the COUNT = DISTINCT COUNT then the Part Group values are unique.
If you can get the Part Group values to be unique in the Weights database, then the relationship can be One-to-One, which makes sense for your mode.
Your assumptions would be correct, thank you i wasnt thinking of it like that. I do however have a report built on the Base data and Grouping database relationship. As to display this data coherently, i need to display by groupings as there is so many part groups. Is there any way i can have both of the relationships connected?
As long as you have a path from Grouping to Base Data then it will still work, it doesn't matter that it flows through the Weight table. You can still use functions like RELATED and RELATEDTABLE as well