Forum Discussion
Help with getting the maximum value from calculated table containing measure column
- 6 years ago
Hi miguelsus2000 ,
Miguel, I tested your sample data. Maybe the following formula can help you. For why you get the sum value, I think it is caused that my sample is too simple. It is filtered by other columns in your actual data.
MAXX = MAXX ( SUMMARIZE ( FILTER ( ALLSELECTED ( 'LoRaBlePayload (2)' ), 'LoRaBlePayload (2)'[Content.BeaconIdentifier] IN FILTERS ( 'LoRaBlePayload (2)'[Content.BeaconIdentifier] ) ), 'LoRaBlePayload (2)'[Content.BeaconIdentifier], 'LoRaBlePayload (2)'[PartitionKey], "New", [Count per BID] ), [New] )Best Regards,
Xue Ding
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi Xue.
Yes, I am using MAXX, but the results look like SUMX, which i don't understand why. Are there any settings which cause MAXX to behave similar to SUMX? I think the formats are correct as well.
Attached is a sample file and also shows the table as it's shown.
| BeaconIdentifier | Created | CreatedTimeInSeconds | DevEui | Major | Minor | PartitionKey | RowKey | Rssi | Tenant | Timestamp |
| 0000-10AB4 | 2019-12-16T22:39:19.906Z | 1576557559 | 70b3d5a4d3100034 | 100 | 13360 | 70b3d5a4d3100034 | 2.51826E+18 | -80 | Tenant1 | 2019-12-17T04:39:19.905Z |
| 0000-10ABV | 2019-12-16T22:39:19.906Z | 1576557559 | 70b3d5a4d3100034 | 100 | 13387 | 70b3d5a4d3100034 | 2.51826E+18 | -90 | Tenant1 | 2019-12-17T04:39:19.906Z |
| 0000-10ABW | 2019-12-16T22:39:19.906Z | 1576557559 | 70b3d5a4d3100034 | 97 | 13388 | 70b3d5a4d3100034 | 2.51826E+18 | -40 | Tenant1 | 2019-12-17T04:39:19.905Z |
| 0000-10ABW | 2019-12-16T22:38:19.868Z | 1576557499 | 70b3d5a4d3100034 | 97 | 13388 | 70b3d5a4d3100034 | 2.51826E+18 | -40 | Tenant1 | 2019-12-17T04:38:19.879Z |
This is the able view in POWERBI
Hi Xue,
Does the info I provided help in any way? For some reason, i still cannot break down the 38 into 4 adn 34 you have?
Thank you...Miguel.
- v-xuding-msft6 years agoCommunity Support
Hi miguelsus2000 ,
Miguel, I tested your sample data. Maybe the following formula can help you. For why you get the sum value, I think it is caused that my sample is too simple. It is filtered by other columns in your actual data.
MAXX = MAXX ( SUMMARIZE ( FILTER ( ALLSELECTED ( 'LoRaBlePayload (2)' ), 'LoRaBlePayload (2)'[Content.BeaconIdentifier] IN FILTERS ( 'LoRaBlePayload (2)'[Content.BeaconIdentifier] ) ), 'LoRaBlePayload (2)'[Content.BeaconIdentifier], 'LoRaBlePayload (2)'[PartitionKey], "New", [Count per BID] ), [New] )Best Regards,
Xue Ding
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
- miguelsus20006 years agoHelper III
Hi Xue, Thank you very much this actually worked. The original calculation was indeed very simple/high level. I wanted to ask you, if I want to extract the partitionkey mostly used, can simply do a value lookup?
No worries if you're busy.
Thank you again!
Cheers,
M