Forum Discussion
Help to define metadata
- Anonymous4 years ago
alalan can you explain what you mean by "I don't want to duplicate rows for same project name and different services"?
It seems to me that in order to make any meaningful use of this data it would need to be in the form:Project Name - external Services Sector Test1 Interior Design Hospitality Test1 Construction Hospitality Test1 Documentation Hospitality Test1 Construction Services Hospitality Test1 Town Planning Hospitality Test2 Feasibility Multi Residential Test2 Town Planning Multi Residential Test2 Interior Design Multi Residential Test2 Construction Multi Residential Test2 Documentation Multi Residential Test2 Construction Services Multi Residential
If you wanted to further normalize and reduce the redundancy of the "Sector" info, you could have two tables like below, related through a one-to-many relationship.Project Name - external Services Test1 Interior Design Test1 Construction Test1 Documentation Test1 Construction Services Test1 Town Planning Test2 Feasibility Test2 Town Planning Test2 Interior Design Test2 Construction Test2 Documentation Test2 Construction Services Project Name - external Sector Test1 Hospitality Test2 Multi Residential - 4 years ago
Hi,
With the current data layout, there is nothing that you can do at all. To get any meaningful analysis, you must ensure that each service appears in its own cell (which also means that in the Project Name and Sector columns, the entries will repeat.
alalan can you explain what you mean by "I don't want to duplicate rows for same project name and different services"?
It seems to me that in order to make any meaningful use of this data it would need to be in the form:
| Project Name - external | Services | Sector |
| Test1 | Interior Design | Hospitality |
| Test1 | Construction | Hospitality |
| Test1 | Documentation | Hospitality |
| Test1 | Construction Services | Hospitality |
| Test1 | Town Planning | Hospitality |
| Test2 | Feasibility | Multi Residential |
| Test2 | Town Planning | Multi Residential |
| Test2 | Interior Design | Multi Residential |
| Test2 | Construction | Multi Residential |
| Test2 | Documentation | Multi Residential |
| Test2 | Construction Services | Multi Residential |
If you wanted to further normalize and reduce the redundancy of the "Sector" info, you could have two tables like below, related through a one-to-many relationship.
| Project Name - external | Services |
| Test1 | Interior Design |
| Test1 | Construction |
| Test1 | Documentation |
| Test1 | Construction Services |
| Test1 | Town Planning |
| Test2 | Feasibility |
| Test2 | Town Planning |
| Test2 | Interior Design |
| Test2 | Construction |
| Test2 | Documentation |
| Test2 | Construction Services |
| Project Name - external | Sector |
| Test1 | Hospitality |
| Test2 | Multi Residential |