Explore and share Fabric Notebooks to boost Power BI insights in the new community notebooks gallery.
Check it out now!Microsoft is giving away 50,000 FREE Microsoft Certification exam vouchers. Get Fabric certified for FREE! Learn more
I have pretty standard star schema relationship.
FactSales Table
Dim Date Table,
Dim Employee Table
Dim Client Table
I have a matrix set out like
Rows: Group > Employee Name > Client Name
Columns: Year > Month
Values: (Variable) Reporting GBP
I have 3 slicers on the page.
1 is for the user to change the SaleTypeId depending on what they want to look at. (Sales, refunds, pending etc)
2 single select year
3 multi select month slicer.
The (Variable) Reporting GBP measure is just a switch function
VAR _s = VALUE ( SELECTEDVALUE ('FactSales[SaleTypeId]'))
RETURN
SWITCH ( TRUE(),
_s = 1, SUM(....
For the majority of selections i want the matrix to only show for the single year and x months the user selected on the date slicer.
There are 2 though that when selected, I want them to ignore the date slicer and show alll years and months. (still retain the sale type id)
So in the switch measure it would be something like, _s = 2, [(£All Measure)]
I create the [(£All Measure)] measure and use ALL() but it still only shows the 1 selected year in the column on the matrix.
It seems to show the overall total for all years in that one year, but I really wanted to pivot the data over all the years but the date filter seems to still be applied.
Is this scenario possible to work?
@RobbLewz , Not very clear. But in such cases have independent tables and use slicer value as per need
example
measure =
var _tab = allselected('Date'[date])
var _cli = allselected('Clinet'[Id])
return
calculate(countrows(FactSales ), filter(FactSales, FactSales[clinetID] in _cli && FactSales[Date] in _tab))
You can use some other filter not to pass a filter