Forum Discussion
Advocate IDynamic Top N and Others
The key to it woyld be to use a calculated table with an extra member for Others. I recently wrote a similar blog
http://sqljason.com/2017/03/dynamic-grouping-in-power-bi-using-dax.html
In this case, the measure in my blog will have to be replaced by the TopN part. Let me know if you have difficulties applying this and if yes, I can explain in more detail (especially if you can give sample data and show the results also, so that I can put it together in apower bi file)
Memorable MemberThe key to it woyld be to use a calculated table with an extra member for Others. I recently wrote a similar blog
http://sqljason.com/2017/03/dynamic-grouping-in-power-bi-using-dax.html
In this case, the measure in my blog will have to be replaced by the TopN part. Let me know if you have difficulties applying this and if yes, I can explain in more detail (especially if you can give sample data and show the results also, so that I can put it together in apower bi file)
Helper II am working on a project. I need to create a dynamic top n which should work when different slicers are used. I used RankX which gives me the results i need when i group on only one column, eg clientgroup, but the issue arises when i add different columns, such as ClientGroup, SalesLocation, SalesPersonName, HoursWorked. The results is not right when i apply different slicers. I tried to create a column for rownumber so that i can get the dynamic topn, that is if the row number can default to start from 1 with increment of 1 whenever any filter is applied. But this is becoming more difficult than i thought. Can anybody help. Urgent please. I have spent several days on this but to no where
vaibhav_oscYou would need to calculate the top n measure against the low level attribute you are showing it against. The filters would work just fine in that scenario. You cannot do it with calculated columns as its impossible to map out every scenario.