Forum Discussion

venug20's avatar
venug20
Icon for Resolver I rankResolver I
7 years ago
Solved

Display state wise sales - exclude slicer selection

Hi everyone,   I have one table.    I want to display "sales", based on Slicer selection.   I have taken "State" into slicer. When choose state in slicer, show all state wise sales, except slic...
Need Help
  • Anonymous's avatar
    Anonymous
    7 years ago

    Hi venug20,

     

    Normal slicer not support exclude filter affect, you need to do some custom steps with a measure as filter to achieve this effect.
    Please take a look at attachment files if it works on your side.

     

    Regards,
    Xiaoxin Sheng

PattemManohar's avatar
PattemManohar
Icon for Community Champion rankCommunity Champion
7 years ago

venug20 Please remove "Market" field from the second visual, then the counts will match as expected.

venug20's avatar
venug20
Icon for Resolver I rankResolver I
7 years ago

Thanks Anonymous it is working fine...

 

Thanks PattemManohar. you suggestion is perfect...

 

 

Anonymous

 

Can you explain step by step, how it's working...

  • Anonymous's avatar
    Anonymous
    Not applicable
    7 years ago

    Hi venug20,

     

    Selector table is used to be the source of slicer, that you can use 'allselected' function to get selected items from slicer.

     

    Selectedvalue function is used to get current row content, then you can compare selected items and current row content to return tag Y if current row are in selected items.

     

    Drag this measure to visual level filter and keep 'N' tag records which means not include in selected items.

     

    Notice: please not create relationship from selected table to original table, it will keep slicer operation only works on measure and not filter on original table.

    Reference links:

    SELECTEDVALUE Function

    ALLSELECTED Function (DAX)

     

    Regards,

    Xiaoxin Sheng

    • venug20's avatar
      venug20
      Icon for Resolver I rankResolver I
      7 years ago

      Hi Xiaoxin Sheng / Anonymous,

       

      Thanks for your explanation, now i understood...