This time we’re going bigger than ever. Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI and more. We're covering it all. You won't want to miss it.
Learn moreGet Fabric Certified for FREE during AI Skills Fest. This week only. Secure your voucher now.
Hi expert,
I will try to share the complex scenario with the following example.
The Cumulative sum doesn't work with my scenario, or rather, the calculation is correct but it is not what I want.
The problem is that in the original table the comparison field is always the same (QTY = 1), but the summarization depends on the applied filters.
Table
Example
Expected values
| NC_CODE | QTY | Running Total MEASURE | Expected Values |
| SCANNERTYPE | 135 | 1187 | 135 |
| CALBUTTON | 129 | 1187 | 264 |
| LIN15KG | 99 | 1187 | 363 |
| LCTYPE | 96 | 1187 | 459 |
| SENTRYFNL | 77 | 1187 | 536 |
| TESTPORT | 77 | 1187 | 613 |
| CALIBRATION | 57 | 1187 | 670 |
| ERASEEMMC | 46 | 1187 | 716 |
| POWERUP | 46 | 1187 | 762 |
| LIN2_5KGD | 43 | 1187 | 805 |
| ECCENTRICITY_RR | 41 | 1187 | 846 |
| READLABEL | 38 | 1187 | 884 |
| LIN1KG | 36 | 1187 | 920 |
| LOADAPP | 32 | 1187 | 952 |
| LOADWAVES | 25 | 1187 | 977 |
| INSTRUCTIONS | 24 | 1187 | 1001 |
| LIN2_5KG | 19 | 1187 | 1020 |
| LOADTOPMN | 18 | 1187 | 1038 |
| LOADCFG | 16 | 1187 | 1054 |
| SENTRYRNL | 14 | 1187 | 1068 |
| TPORTOFF | 13 | 1187 | 1081 |
| CURRENT | 11 | 1187 | 1092 |
| ECCENTRICITY_RF | 11 | 1187 | 1103 |
| SCALE | 10 | 1187 | 1113 |
| SETHWID | 9 | 1187 | 1122 |
| EXERCISE | 6 | 1187 | 1128 |
| LIN1KGD | 6 | 1187 | 1134 |
| SELFTESTMAN | 6 | 1187 | 1140 |
| SETIF | 6 | 1187 | 1146 |
| LIN10KG | 5 | 1187 | 1151 |
| LIN6KG | 5 | 1187 | 1156 |
| MAXKG | 4 | 1187 | 1160 |
| ENGAGE | 3 | 1187 | 1163 |
| LCCHKSUM | 3 | 1187 | 1166 |
| LIN15KGD | 3 | 1187 | 1169 |
| SENTRYRFL | 3 | 1187 | 1172 |
| SOME RANDOM | 3 | 1187 | 1175 |
| ZEROACCURACY | 3 | 1187 | 1178 |
| ECCENTRICITY_LR | 2 | 1187 | 1180 |
| LIN10KGD | 2 | 1187 | 1182 |
| COUNTMODE0 | 1 | 1187 | 1183 |
| ECCENTRICITY_LF | 1 | 1187 | 1184 |
| LCSPSWID | 1 | 1187 | 1185 |
| LIN6KGD | 1 | 1187 | 1186 |
| SET_IF | 1 | 1187 | 1187 |
Here you can find the link to the file
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @Gpensabene ,
Create a measure for the total quantity and use that measure as your value in the filter so you will need this two measures:
TotalQTY = SUM ('Table'[QTY])
Running Total MEASURE__ =
IF (
NOT ( ISBLANK ( [TotalQTY] ) );
CALCULATE (
[TotalQTY];
FILTER ( ALL ( 'Table'[NC_CODE] ); SUM ( 'Table'[QTY] ) <= [TotalQTY] )
)
)
Now if you add to your model you get the result below:
Check PBIX file attach.
Regards
Miguel Félix
Proud to be a Super User!
Check out my blog: Power BI em PortuguêsHi @Gpensabene ,
I have tested the pbix file that MFelix did. It works perfectly. If it works for you, please accept the helpful answer as a solution. If you still have questions, please feel free to ask us.
Hi @Gpensabene ,
Create a measure for the total quantity and use that measure as your value in the filter so you will need this two measures:
TotalQTY = SUM ('Table'[QTY])
Running Total MEASURE__ =
IF (
NOT ( ISBLANK ( [TotalQTY] ) );
CALCULATE (
[TotalQTY];
FILTER ( ALL ( 'Table'[NC_CODE] ); SUM ( 'Table'[QTY] ) <= [TotalQTY] )
)
)
Now if you add to your model you get the result below:
Check PBIX file attach.
Regards
Miguel Félix
Proud to be a Super User!
Check out my blog: Power BI em PortuguêsCheck out the May 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Sign up to receive a private message when registration opens and key events begin.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 25 | |
| 24 | |
| 22 | |
| 21 | |
| 19 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 52 | |
| 48 | |
| 47 | |
| 22 | |
| 21 |