Forum Discussion
Calculating whether a service level has been met
- Anonymous10 years ago
OK, I found the flaws in my logic. My previous formula ignored row context all over the place. This version gives the results I was attempting before. I don't know if this will work in DirectQuery though, because it includes SUMMARIZE and ADDCOLUMNS. You might be able to get around that if you go into Options and check the box marked "Allow unrestricted measures in DirectQuery Mode."
Pass/Fail = IF( HASONEVALUE(Parts[Part Type]), VAR target = MIN(Parts[Target SLA]) / 100 VAR passfail = ADDCOLUMNS( SUMMARIZE( Parts, Parts[RowID] ), "pass", CALCULATE(MIN(Parts[Lead Time Achieved]) <= MIN(Parts[Lead Time Target])) ) RETURN IF( DIVIDE( COUNTROWS(FILTER(passfail, [pass] = TRUE)), COUNTROWS(passfail) ) >= target, "Pass", "Fail" ), VAR partscores = SUMMARIZE( Parts, Parts[Part Type], "score", VAR tg = CALCULATE(MIN(Parts[Target SLA])) / 100 RETURN IF( DIVIDE( CALCULATE( COUNTROWS( FILTER( ADDCOLUMNS( Parts, "pass", CALCULATE(MIN(Parts[Lead Time Achieved]) <= MIN(Parts[Lead Time Target])) ), [pass] = TRUE ) ) ), CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(Parts)) ) >= tg, "Pass", "Fail" ) ) RETURN FORMAT( DIVIDE( CALCULATE( DISTINCTCOUNT(Parts[Part Type]), FILTER(partscores, [score] = "Pass") ), DISTINCTCOUNT(Parts[Part Type]) ), "0%" ) & " Passed" )
1) First Create a COLUMN Yes/No
Yes/No = IF ('Table1'[Lead Time Achieved]<='Table1'[Lead Time Target], "Yes", "No")2) Then these 4 MEASURES
Target Achieved = COUNTROWS ( FILTER ('Table1', 'Table1'[Yes/No]="Yes") )
Part Transactions = CALCULATE ( COUNTROWS('Table1'), ALLEXCEPT('Table1', 'Table1'[Part Type]) )
Rate = DIVIDE ( [Target Achieved], [Part Transactions], 0 )
Pass/Fail = IF ( [Rate] > DIVIDE( SUM(Table1[Target SLA]), [Part Transactions], 0), "Success", "Fail")I'm assuming Target SLA is formatted as a percentage!
I wonder if the last measure Pass/Fail could be done slightly differently but basically I'm getting the average which if all numbers are the same should give you the same number at the Part Type Level!
Anonymous how would you handle this? I wonder if there's a more efficient way?
Anyway I think this should give you the results you are looking for?
It would help if each row had a unique row identifier. You could always enter an index column in the query editor if there isn't already one that just wasn't shown in the sample data. If you had that you could do it all in one measure with no extra calculated columns.
Pass/Fail = VAR target = MIN(Parts[Target SLA]) / 100 VAR passfail = ADDCOLUMNS( SUMMARIZE( Parts, Parts[RowID] ), "pass", CALCULATE(MIN(Parts[Lead Time Achieved]) <= MIN(Parts[Lead Time Target])) ) RETURN IF( DIVIDE( COUNTROWS(FILTER(passfail, [pass] = TRUE)), COUNTROWS(passfail) ) >= target, "Pass", "Fail" )
I don't know how quickly that would work on a truly massive dataset, but if the table has a reasonable number of rows it should be fine.
- Anonymous10 years agoNot applicable
It's Friday afternoon. Time to get really goofy.
This version returns the expected Pass/Fail score for each Part Type. But on any total/subtotal lines that represent multiple part types, it returns the percent of represented parts that passed overall:
Pass/Fail = VAR passfail = ADDCOLUMNS( SUMMARIZE( Parts, Parts[RowID] ), "pass", CALCULATE(MIN(Parts[Lead Time Achieved]) <= MIN(Parts[Lead Time Target])) ) RETURN IF( HASONEVALUE(Parts[Part Type]), VAR target = MIN(Parts[Target SLA]) / 100 RETURN IF( DIVIDE( COUNTROWS(FILTER(passfail, [pass] = TRUE)), COUNTROWS(passfail) ) >= target, "Pass", "Fail" ), VAR partscores = SUMMARIZE( Parts, Parts[Part Type], "score", VAR target = MIN(Parts[Target SLA]) / 100 RETURN IF( DIVIDE( COUNTROWS(FILTER(passfail, [pass] = TRUE)), COUNTROWS(passfail) ) >= target, "Pass", "Fail" ) ) RETURN FORMAT( DIVIDE( CALCULATE( DISTINCTCOUNT(Parts[Part Type]), FILTER(partscores, [score] = "Pass") ), DISTINCTCOUNT(Parts[Part Type]) ), "0%" ) & " Passed" )
- Sean10 years ago
Community Champion
Wow Anonymous have you heard of decaf :smileylol: I'll review both of these later today or tomorrow :smileyhappy:
- Anonymous10 years agoNot applicable
- Andy_Chandler10 years agoFrequent Visitor
This is close, although if I set the Target SLA to 49 for P1, it calculates 50% overall where it should be 100% (50>49, 75>74)
- Anonymous10 years agoNot applicable
Oops, yeah I've done some more testing and it was just a coincidence that the right answer was what it produced. Basically it's counting all "pass" values rather than using Part Type as a filtering context in the subtotal. I'll have to rework this a little...