Forum Discussion

CarlsBerg999's avatar
CarlsBerg999
Helper V
4 years ago
Solved

Calculated column (CALCULATE + FILTER) from the same table

Hi,    I'm trying to create a calculated column that returns for values based on two adjacent columns in the same table. For some reason, the value that is returned is not correct. I think this mig...
Need Help
  • SpartaBI's avatar
    SpartaBI
    4 years ago

    CarlsBerg999 so yes, it's because of your max you did in the beginning. I suspected right 🙂
    Try this:

     

    Project ID =
VAR CurrentRowSO = 'Sales'[Sales Order ID]
VAR Task_ID = MAXX(FILTER('Sales', 'Sales'[Sales Order ID] = CurrentRowSO), 'Sales'[Task ID])

RETURN
    CALCULATE (
        LEFT (
            Task_ID,
            LEN ( Task_ID )
                - (
                    LEN ( Task_ID ) - FIND ( "-", Task_ID ) + 1
                )
        ),
        'Sales'[Task ID] <> BLANK (),
        'Sales'[Sales Order ID] = CurrentRowSO
    )

     







          

    Showcase Report – Contoso By SpartaBI

CarlsBerg999's avatar
CarlsBerg999
Helper V
4 years ago

This produced the same result as my code (=incorrect). The table below shows a part of the actual table and the hoped outcome. The code above (as well as mine) returned P99, which is incorrect and ignores the filter that says Sales Order ID must be CurrentRowSO. 

 

Sales Order IDSales Order Line Item IDSO ID & SO Line Item IDItem Cancel IDItem Cancel TextTask IDProject ID
60620606-201Not Canceled P88
60610606-101Not CanceledP88-2P88
SpartaBI's avatar
SpartaBI
Community Champion
4 years ago

CarlsBerg999 so yes, it's because of your max you did in the beginning. I suspected right 🙂
Try this:

 

Project ID =
VAR CurrentRowSO = 'Sales'[Sales Order ID]
VAR Task_ID = MAXX(FILTER('Sales', 'Sales'[Sales Order ID] = CurrentRowSO), 'Sales'[Task ID])

RETURN
    CALCULATE (
        LEFT (
            Task_ID,
            LEN ( Task_ID )
                - (
                    LEN ( Task_ID ) - FIND ( "-", Task_ID ) + 1
                )
        ),
        'Sales'[Task ID] <> BLANK (),
        'Sales'[Sales Order ID] = CurrentRowSO
    )

 







      

Showcase Report – Contoso By SpartaBI

  • CarlsBerg999's avatar
    CarlsBerg999
    Helper V
    4 years ago

    This works. What are we doing in this code differently. In the variable, the Task_ID apparently iterates through the entire table (which is filtered by the CurrentRowSO), looking for the largest figure. The largest figure is never "blank".

     

    --> Do we even need the calculate function? 

    Project ID = 
VAR CurrentRowSO = 'ODATA | Biovian | Sales Order Volume Extended'[Sales Order ID]
VAR Task_ID = MAXX(FILTER('ODATA | Biovian | Sales Order Volume Extended','ODATA | Biovian | Sales Order Volume Extended'[Sales Order ID]=CurrentRowSO),'ODATA | Biovian | Sales Order Volume Extended'[Task ID])

RETURN
        LEFT (
            Task_ID,
            LEN ( Task_ID )
                - (
                    LEN ( Task_ID ) - FIND ( "-", Task_ID ) +1
                )
        )

     

    • SpartaBI's avatar
      SpartaBI
      Community Champion
      4 years ago

      CarlsBerg999 yep you don't need such a long code in general when you are trying to do something like that. You can also write:

       

       

      ProjectID =
VAR CurrentRowSO = 'Sales'[Sales Order ID]
VAR Task_ID = MAXX(FILTER('Sales', 'Sales'[Sales Order ID] = CurrentRowSO && 'Sales'[Task ID] <> BLANK()), 'Sales'[Task ID])

RETURN
   LEFT (
        Task_ID,
        LEN ( Task_ID )
            - (LEN ( Task_ID ) - FIND ( "-", Task_ID ) + 1)
    )

       

       





            

      P.S. Check out my showcase report - got some high level stuff there. Sure you will find there a lot of cool ideas. Please give it a thumbs up over there if you liked it 🙂
      Showcase Report – Contoso By SpartaBI