Don't miss your chance to take exam DP-600 or DP-700 on us!
Request nowLearn from the best! Meet the four finalists headed to the FINALS of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships! Register now
Hi
I have tables DimSalesperson and FactSales. They are related by SalesPerson
DimSalesperson:
| Salesperson | TargetTotalSales |
| Amit | 4000 |
| Barbara | 5000 |
| Carolina | 6000 |
| Deng | 7000 |
FactSales:
| InvoiceNum | SalesDate | SalesPerson | GrossInvoice | SalesTax |
| 1 | 23/3/2016 | Deng | 758.85 | 92 |
| 2 | 29/3/2016 | Barbara | 154.93 | 98.97 |
| 3 | 5/4/2016 | Barbara | 651.56 | 62.97 |
| 4 | 14/4/2016 | Deng | 262.2 | 23.63 |
| 5 | 24/4/2016 | Amit | 674.17 | 94.68 |
| 6 | 30/4/2016 | Barbara | 468.93 | 26.42 |
| 7 | 8/5/2016 | Carolina | 256.9 | 89.74 |
| 8 | 17/5/2016 | Deng | 939.97 | 97.21 |
| …etc... | …etc... | …etc... | …etc... | …etc... |
I added three measures to FactSales:
And I have a basic table visualistion showing total netAmt for each SalesPerson. (I have included Salesperson twice - once from Dimension and once from Fact - to clarify the later problem)
| NetAmt | SalesPerson | Salesperson |
| 4173.67 | Amit | Amit |
| 5905.81 | Barbara | Barbara |
| 2249 | Carolina | Carolina |
| 4262 | Deng | Deng |
I can add TargetTotalSales and DiffToSalesTarget and it behaves as expected - the values are calculated in context.
| NetAmt | SalesPerson | Salesperson | TargetTotalSales | DiffToSalesTarget |
| 4173.67 | Amit | Amit | 4000 | 173.67 |
| 5905.81 | Barbara | Barbara | 5000 | 905.81 |
| 2249 | Carolina | Carolina | 6000 | -3751 |
| 4262 | Deng | Deng | 7000 | -2738 |
However if I add MetSalesTarget, for each sales person in the Fact table, I get a line for every SalesPerson in the Dimension table. It is as if the relationship no longer exists.:
| NetAmt | SalesPerson | Salesperson | TargetTotalSales | DiffToSalesTargget | MetSalesTarget |
| 4173.67 | Amit | Amit | 4000 | 173.67 | TRUE |
| Amit | Barbara | 5000 | FALSE | ||
| Amit | Carolina | 6000 | FALSE | ||
| Amit | Deng | 7000 | FALSE | ||
| Barbara | Amit | 4000 | FALSE | ||
| 5905.81 | Barbara | Barbara | 5000 | 905.81 | TRUE |
| Barbara | Carolina | 6000 | FALSE | ||
| Barbara | Deng | 7000 | FALSE | ||
| Carolina | Amit | 4000 | FALSE | ||
| Carolina | Barbara | 5000 | FALSE | ||
| 2249 | Carolina | Carolina | 6000 | -3751 | FALSE |
| Carolina | Deng | 7000 | FALSE | ||
| Deng | Amit | 4000 | FALSE | ||
| Deng | Barbara | 5000 | FALSE | ||
| Deng | Carolina | 6000 | FALSE | ||
| 4262 | Deng | Deng | 7000 | -2738 | FALSE |
What am I doing wrong?
Many thanks
Liz
Hi
Thank you for helping with my problem.
I see a filter gives the results I want, but it feels like a workaround to a problem in my measure. I am new to Power BI and not sure what is good practice! Is it usual to generate and filter out the "wrong" results ?
Liz
@databubble,
Generally, we don’t drag SalesPerson fields of both table to create a visual. We only drag SalesPerson field from either DimSalesperson table or FactSales table to visuals in Power BI, this way, expected result will return.
Regards,
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
Check out the February 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 51 | |
| 40 | |
| 37 | |
| 14 | |
| 14 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 85 | |
| 69 | |
| 38 | |
| 29 | |
| 27 |