Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-700) exam on us!
Learn moreWe've captured the moments from FabCon & SQLCon that everyone is talking about, and we are bringing them to the community, live and on-demand. Starts on April 14th. Register now
Hi
I have tables DimSalesperson and FactSales. They are related by SalesPerson
DimSalesperson:
| Salesperson | TargetTotalSales |
| Amit | 4000 |
| Barbara | 5000 |
| Carolina | 6000 |
| Deng | 7000 |
FactSales:
| InvoiceNum | SalesDate | SalesPerson | GrossInvoice | SalesTax |
| 1 | 23/3/2016 | Deng | 758.85 | 92 |
| 2 | 29/3/2016 | Barbara | 154.93 | 98.97 |
| 3 | 5/4/2016 | Barbara | 651.56 | 62.97 |
| 4 | 14/4/2016 | Deng | 262.2 | 23.63 |
| 5 | 24/4/2016 | Amit | 674.17 | 94.68 |
| 6 | 30/4/2016 | Barbara | 468.93 | 26.42 |
| 7 | 8/5/2016 | Carolina | 256.9 | 89.74 |
| 8 | 17/5/2016 | Deng | 939.97 | 97.21 |
| …etc... | …etc... | …etc... | …etc... | …etc... |
I added three measures to FactSales:
And I have a basic table visualistion showing total netAmt for each SalesPerson. (I have included Salesperson twice - once from Dimension and once from Fact - to clarify the later problem)
| NetAmt | SalesPerson | Salesperson |
| 4173.67 | Amit | Amit |
| 5905.81 | Barbara | Barbara |
| 2249 | Carolina | Carolina |
| 4262 | Deng | Deng |
I can add TargetTotalSales and DiffToSalesTarget and it behaves as expected - the values are calculated in context.
| NetAmt | SalesPerson | Salesperson | TargetTotalSales | DiffToSalesTarget |
| 4173.67 | Amit | Amit | 4000 | 173.67 |
| 5905.81 | Barbara | Barbara | 5000 | 905.81 |
| 2249 | Carolina | Carolina | 6000 | -3751 |
| 4262 | Deng | Deng | 7000 | -2738 |
However if I add MetSalesTarget, for each sales person in the Fact table, I get a line for every SalesPerson in the Dimension table. It is as if the relationship no longer exists.:
| NetAmt | SalesPerson | Salesperson | TargetTotalSales | DiffToSalesTargget | MetSalesTarget |
| 4173.67 | Amit | Amit | 4000 | 173.67 | TRUE |
| Amit | Barbara | 5000 | FALSE | ||
| Amit | Carolina | 6000 | FALSE | ||
| Amit | Deng | 7000 | FALSE | ||
| Barbara | Amit | 4000 | FALSE | ||
| 5905.81 | Barbara | Barbara | 5000 | 905.81 | TRUE |
| Barbara | Carolina | 6000 | FALSE | ||
| Barbara | Deng | 7000 | FALSE | ||
| Carolina | Amit | 4000 | FALSE | ||
| Carolina | Barbara | 5000 | FALSE | ||
| 2249 | Carolina | Carolina | 6000 | -3751 | FALSE |
| Carolina | Deng | 7000 | FALSE | ||
| Deng | Amit | 4000 | FALSE | ||
| Deng | Barbara | 5000 | FALSE | ||
| Deng | Carolina | 6000 | FALSE | ||
| 4262 | Deng | Deng | 7000 | -2738 | FALSE |
What am I doing wrong?
Many thanks
Liz
Hi
Thank you for helping with my problem.
I see a filter gives the results I want, but it feels like a workaround to a problem in my measure. I am new to Power BI and not sure what is good practice! Is it usual to generate and filter out the "wrong" results ?
Liz
@databubble,
Generally, we don’t drag SalesPerson fields of both table to create a visual. We only drag SalesPerson field from either DimSalesperson table or FactSales table to visuals in Power BI, this way, expected result will return.
Regards,
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 52 | |
| 38 | |
| 37 | |
| 19 | |
| 18 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 67 | |
| 67 | |
| 34 | |
| 32 | |
| 29 |