Forum Discussion
All individuals in the same team have the same target
Dears
I'm getting a bit frustating here as I need 1 more step but I can't think how to solve this issue.
So I have a measure summing all individual targets for the month. Nothing complicated.
Each individual belongs to a team. If I dump my team list + measure summig targets, I will have each team target based on the persons belonging to each team.
But my problem is that I want to show the TEAM TARGET in a matrix table where it contains the person names.
So basically the applied person name filter must be disregarded and sum must be as per the persons team.
More or less something like this
As you can see the total team target remains the same for all team mates.
I have a table with D_staff list names + a unique table of the D_team list + F_tables that was used to build the target measure.
Thank you for the assistance
4 Replies
- amitchandak
Super User
Can you share the formula of team Target you are using and the expected outcome?
- rnetoFrequent Visitor
Hi there the team target has not been built in a single measure, but basically its summing both DURANTIONS from F_Gen + F_Det. this duration has been multipled by a denominator to calculate individual monthly targets.
The relationship is based on the ID column (employee level).
What I wish to accomplished is a part of showing each employee target, also to create a column where the target is not filtered down to the employee level, but also show the targets of the team that each employee belongs.
As you can see below employess belonging to team Alpha have the same sum in the Team target column.
Name Team Individual Target Team Target Alban Alpha 1000 2500 Bianca Bravo 500 1500 Carlos Alpha 500 2500 Diana Alpha 1000 2500 Elia Bravo 1000 1500 Please advise if this is enough or you need anything else.
Thanks
- v-eachen-msft
Community Support
Hi rneto ,
You could use "merge queries" to merge these three tables to one table in the query editor.
- rnetoFrequent Visitor
Hello there
Not possible all tables have different structure.
Thanks though