Forum Discussion
Active / Inactive relationships
- 6 years ago
OK, look at your picture and follow your arrows
Path 1: Date Calendar -> MEP Planned -> Company -> MEP Actual
Path 2: Date Calendar -> MEP Actual
2 paths, both cannot be active. I don't know how to explain this any differently.
For that matter, you also have 2 paths from Date Calendar to Company and Date Calendar to MEP Planned so you basically just have a big circle and that is generally not a good data model.
It's not the same, in your first model, Date Calendar table has 2 paths to MEP Actual table. Just follow your arrows.
You cannot have 2 active pathways between the same 2 tables in your model. If you create 2 paths, one will become inactive. You can still use it by specifying USERELATIONSHIP. However, if you find yourself using USERELATIONSHIP nine times out of ten, you should rethink your data model.
- Mike_Mace6 years agoResolver I
Hi Greg_Deckler ,
The second arrow led to another independent variable. It's not affecting MEP Actual table.
Reattaching with the relationships to the other viariables deleted.
- Greg_Deckler6 years agoCommunity Champion
OK, look at your picture and follow your arrows
Path 1: Date Calendar -> MEP Planned -> Company -> MEP Actual
Path 2: Date Calendar -> MEP Actual
2 paths, both cannot be active. I don't know how to explain this any differently.
For that matter, you also have 2 paths from Date Calendar to Company and Date Calendar to MEP Planned so you basically just have a big circle and that is generally not a good data model.