Forum Discussion

SS0101's avatar
SS0101
New Member
2 years ago
Solved

Using Calculate function with two tables

hi guys, I'm struggling with the following problem: I have two tables: 1. projects table. each row represents a project that has a "start date" and "End date" 2. regular calendar table   I want...
"CALCULATE"
  • Anonymous's avatar
    Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Hi  SS0101 ,

     

    You can try the following measure:

    Measure =
var _select=SELECTEDVALUE('Calendar Table'[Date])
return
COUNTX(
    FILTER(ALL('projects table'),
    _select>='projects table'[StartDate]&&_select<='projects table'[EndDate]),[project])

    Or add an ALL() function to the original Dax.

    ALL function (DAX) - DAX | Microsoft Learn

    If it doesn't meet your desired outcome, can you share sample data and sample output in table format? Or a sample pbix after removing sensitive data. We can better understand the problem and help you.

     

    Best Regards,

    Liu Yang

    If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

Anonymous's avatar
Anonymous
Not applicable
2 years ago

Hi  SS0101 ,

 

You can try the following measure:

Measure =
var _select=SELECTEDVALUE('Calendar Table'[Date])
return
COUNTX(
    FILTER(ALL('projects table'),
    _select>='projects table'[StartDate]&&_select<='projects table'[EndDate]),[project])

Or add an ALL() function to the original Dax.

ALL function (DAX) - DAX | Microsoft Learn

If it doesn't meet your desired outcome, can you share sample data and sample output in table format? Or a sample pbix after removing sensitive data. We can better understand the problem and help you.

 

Best Regards,

Liu Yang

If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

  • SS0101's avatar
    SS0101
    New Member
    2 years ago

    thanks Liu Yang!

    that nearly solved my issues, however - In this setup, I can't use any slicer (doesn't have any effect). is it due to the ALL command? how can it be worked around?

     

    thanks