Forum Discussion

NotebookEnjoyer's avatar
NotebookEnjoyer
Advocate II
4 months ago
Solved

USERELATIONSHIP problems with n:m-relationship

Hello everyone, I have an arrangement as follows: Therein, the following measure unfortunately yields blank values: Sum by inactive Relationship = SUMX(     VALUES('Fact_2'[Key_F2]),    ...
  • Abdullahmajid1's avatar
    Abdullahmajid1
    4 months ago

    Try this:

     

    Sum F1 by F2 :=
CALCULATE(
    SUM('Fact_1'[Value_F1]),
    TREATAS(
        VALUES('Fact_2'[Key_D1]),
        'Fact_1'[Key_D1]
    ),
    REMOVEFILTERS('Map1')
)
johnt75's avatar
johnt75
Super User
4 months ago

I don't think that that is the problem.

Can you create a measure like

Test Sum =
SUMX ( 'Fact_2', CALCULATE ( SUM ( 'Fact_1'[Value_F1] ) ) )

and put that into a table / matrix with 'Fact_2'[Key_D1]. This isn't using the inactive relationship at all so should tell us if the active relationships are working as intended.

NotebookEnjoyer's avatar
NotebookEnjoyer
Advocate II
4 months ago

In short, it works. (In long, I have to add a filter because for each entry there is each one positive and negative entry, canceling each other out, and I have left out of my model the dimension table by which this is filtered. But it works.)

  • johnt75's avatar
    johnt75
    Super User
    4 months ago

    Try

    Sum by inactive Relationship =
VAR _Keys =
    CALCULATETABLE (
        VALUES ( 'Fact_2'[Key_F2] ),
        USERELATIONSHIP ( 'Dim_1'[Key_D1], 'Fact_2'[Key_D1] )
    )
VAR Result =
    CALCULATE ( SUM ( 'Fact_1'[Value_F1] ), TREATAS ( _Keys, 'Fact_1'[Key_F2] ) )
RETURN
    Result