Check your eligibility for this 50% exam voucher offer and join us for free live learning sessions to get prepared for Exam DP-700.
Get StartedDon't miss out! 2025 Microsoft Fabric Community Conference, March 31 - April 2, Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount. Prices go up February 11th. Register now.
Hi, I am confused about the result of a DAX formula that is giving an unexpected result.
Notice how the totals for the 2 columns don't add up? This is a filtered table.
Scores |
129 |
99 |
246 |
213 |
243 |
Solved! Go to Solution.
In the total there is no filter on patient. Sumx is iterating over all 5 patients. While iterating it evaluates the second argument (MAX). Because there is no filter context it will evaluate every time the max of all patients (246). In the last step it will aggrate the five 246 in an sum (1260).
Thank you JW_van_Holst! I now get where this number comes from. That makes sense to me.
In the total there is no filter on patient. Sumx is iterating over all 5 patients. While iterating it evaluates the second argument (MAX). Because there is no filter context it will evaluate every time the max of all patients (246). In the last step it will aggrate the five 246 in an sum (1260).
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Check out the January 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features in Reporting, Modeling, and Data Connectivity.
User | Count |
---|---|
15 | |
10 | |
9 | |
8 | |
6 |
User | Count |
---|---|
13 | |
12 | |
11 | |
10 | |
10 |