Microsoft Fabric Community Conference 2025, March 31 - April 2, Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code FABINSIDER for a $400 discount.
Register nowGet inspired! Check out the entries from the Power BI DataViz World Championships preliminary rounds and give kudos to your favorites. View the vizzies.
Hi,
I've been searching but can't seem to find the right answer, so looking for your help.
I'm using the following formula:
SalesLastYear = CALCULATE( SUM(Sales_DailyReport[Net amount]),SAMEPERIODLASTYEAR(Sales_DailyReport[Invoice Date]))
However, I'm working with different product caterogies. Now, if a product category hasn't been sold on a particalur day, the formula won't retrieve the value for that product catergory for the same day last year either.
For example:
Sold on 6 May 2020: | Sold on 6 May 2019: | My (incorrect) result of formula, sold on 6 May 2019: |
Product 1: $700 | Product 1: $500 | Product 1: $500 |
Product 2: $200 | Product 3: $50 |
So I need to see the total of $550, but the formula doesn't 'see' product 3 as it was not sold on 6 May 2020.
I have tried multiple variations of DAX, including ALL , VALUES (to include the product categories) and DATEADD, .[date], PARALLELPERIOD (to try different ways), all without success.
Any thoughts please?
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @SvG,
I think the issue here comes down to the DAX auto-exists concept. You should build a proper date table to do your time-intelligence on. You see, the auto-exist concept allows DAX to be efficient and since product 3 doesn't exist in the original context my take on it is that it is "lost" due to the auto-exist optimisation of the DAX language, even when SAMEPERIODLASTYEAR shifts the context.
Try adding a date table and using SAMEPERIODLASTYEAR on this instead. Also refer to this article.
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/understanding-dax-auto-exist/
Hope it helps
Kris
Hi @SvG,
I think the issue here comes down to the DAX auto-exists concept. You should build a proper date table to do your time-intelligence on. You see, the auto-exist concept allows DAX to be efficient and since product 3 doesn't exist in the original context my take on it is that it is "lost" due to the auto-exist optimisation of the DAX language, even when SAMEPERIODLASTYEAR shifts the context.
Try adding a date table and using SAMEPERIODLASTYEAR on this instead. Also refer to this article.
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/understanding-dax-auto-exist/
Hope it helps
Kris
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Check out the February 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
23 | |
12 | |
10 | |
10 | |
8 |
User | Count |
---|---|
16 | |
15 | |
15 | |
12 | |
10 |