<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dataflows Gen 2 vs Lakehouse for storing data in staging / transform phase in Dataflow</title>
    <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dataflows-Gen-2-vs-Lakehouse-for-storing-data-in-staging/m-p/4105896#M3658</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;Anonymous&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First of all if you are dealing with large amounts of data or complex data transformations, then Writing to a Lakehouse has more extra control and scalability.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If your main goal is to integrate data flows within the Power Platform ecosystem, then Using Internal Lakehouse Staging may be more efficient.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So in summary if simplicity and fast integration are your top priorities, Internal Lakehouse Staging may be a better choice. However, if you need more control and scalability, then writing to Lakehouse and using the OneHub/Lakehouse connector may be worth the extra effort.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you want to learn more about this, I think you can read this document:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/data-factory/dataflow-gen2-data-destinations-and-managed-settings" target="_blank"&gt;Dataflow Gen2 data destinations and managed settings - Microsoft Fabric | Microsoft Learn&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yilong Zhou&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If this post&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;I&gt;helps&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, then please consider&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;I&gt;Accept it as the solution&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;to help the other members find it more quickly.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 01:40:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-19T01:40:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dataflows Gen 2 vs Lakehouse for storing data in staging / transform phase</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dataflows-Gen-2-vs-Lakehouse-for-storing-data-in-staging/m-p/4104957#M3644</link>
      <description>&lt;H1&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I learned that Dataflows Gen 2 use an internal Lakehouse to store data when you enable staging on a query in the dataflow. You could then re-use that data in another dataflow through an powerplatforms-connector. What would be the benefit of the other route: writing the query output to a Lakehouse and re-using that data in another dataflow through the OneHub/Lakehouse connector? It is more work to store the data in the Lakehouse (for every query you have to manually set the output destination table, checking datatypes etc.) so now I am thinking using the Dataflows Gen 2 internal staging Lakehouse is better, am I right or do I overlook imported implications?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 00:26:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dataflows-Gen-2-vs-Lakehouse-for-storing-data-in-staging/m-p/4104957#M3644</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-17T00:26:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dataflows Gen 2 vs Lakehouse for storing data in staging / transform phase</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dataflows-Gen-2-vs-Lakehouse-for-storing-data-in-staging/m-p/4105896#M3658</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;Anonymous&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First of all if you are dealing with large amounts of data or complex data transformations, then Writing to a Lakehouse has more extra control and scalability.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If your main goal is to integrate data flows within the Power Platform ecosystem, then Using Internal Lakehouse Staging may be more efficient.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So in summary if simplicity and fast integration are your top priorities, Internal Lakehouse Staging may be a better choice. However, if you need more control and scalability, then writing to Lakehouse and using the OneHub/Lakehouse connector may be worth the extra effort.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you want to learn more about this, I think you can read this document:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/data-factory/dataflow-gen2-data-destinations-and-managed-settings" target="_blank"&gt;Dataflow Gen2 data destinations and managed settings - Microsoft Fabric | Microsoft Learn&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yilong Zhou&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If this post&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;I&gt;helps&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, then please consider&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;I&gt;Accept it as the solution&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;to help the other members find it more quickly.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 01:40:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dataflows-Gen-2-vs-Lakehouse-for-storing-data-in-staging/m-p/4105896#M3658</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-19T01:40:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

