<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dynamic destinations in data flows? in Dataflow</title>
    <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dynamic-destinations-in-data-flows/m-p/3880013#M2841</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That is correct. This is the current behavior today.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can request this as a new feature as an idea in the Fabric Ideas portal:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://aka.ms/FabricIdeas" target="_blank"&gt;https://aka.ms/FabricIdeas&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A different approach would be to use a script in a notebook that does the iterative work on all the tables that you require. For Dataflow Gen2, today, you have to setup the destination for every query&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:15:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>miguel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-30T15:15:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dynamic destinations in data flows?</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dynamic-destinations-in-data-flows/m-p/3879996#M2839</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I want to create a process to clean up a table in a data flow (ie trim whitespace, convert dates, etc). I have lots and lots of tables, and I want to apply the same process to. I was interested in using a data flow to set up that process and then have a pipeline run dataflows for each table on my list. The problem is that it seems like each data flow has to have a fixed destination table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I missing something? Is there not a way to dynamically set the dataflow destination/output so the same dataflow could be used on many different tables?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:10:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dynamic-destinations-in-data-flows/m-p/3879996#M2839</guid>
      <dc:creator>rowrowrow2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T15:10:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic destinations in data flows?</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dynamic-destinations-in-data-flows/m-p/3880013#M2841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is correct. This is the current behavior today.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can request this as a new feature as an idea in the Fabric Ideas portal:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://aka.ms/FabricIdeas" target="_blank"&gt;https://aka.ms/FabricIdeas&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A different approach would be to use a script in a notebook that does the iterative work on all the tables that you require. For Dataflow Gen2, today, you have to setup the destination for every query&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:15:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dynamic-destinations-in-data-flows/m-p/3880013#M2841</guid>
      <dc:creator>miguel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T15:15:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic destinations in data flows?</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dynamic-destinations-in-data-flows/m-p/3880038#M2842</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's a link to the feature request:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://ideas.fabric.microsoft.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=23a1e79c-0507-ef11-a73c-6045bdb80219" target="_blank"&gt;https://ideas.fabric.microsoft.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=23a1e79c-0507-ef11-a73c-6045bdb80219&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:24:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dynamic-destinations-in-data-flows/m-p/3880038#M2842</guid>
      <dc:creator>rowrowrow2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T15:24:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic destinations in data flows?</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dynamic-destinations-in-data-flows/m-p/3880043#M2843</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As of now, I am using the notebook approach. It works fine, but due to the slow notebook startup time, it has to be done in a batch and can't quickly do a few one off tables since it takes 30-60 seconds just to have a notebook startup. There's also the issue of notebooks failing to start, but hopefully that's taken care of with the new notebook queueing that was announced on April 18.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:27:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Dataflow/Dynamic-destinations-in-data-flows/m-p/3880043#M2843</guid>
      <dc:creator>rowrowrow2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T15:27:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

