<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic #Temp tables defined under a different collation to the underlying warehouse in Data Warehouse</title>
    <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Temp-tables-defined-under-a-different-collation-to-the/m-p/5134715#M4351</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;So Microsoft Fabric goes through a lot of trouble to abstract and provide a programming model that is similar to normal SQL stored procedures. However, session scoped temporary tables (SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS) are created in a collation different to that of an underlying warehouse (Latin1_General_100_BIN2_UTF8). Now I accept the explanation that the underlying engine used for session scoped temporary tables is different. What I don't accept is how an actraction has leaked into the programming model forcing developers to either manually specify collation at create or join time or create the table with distribution. The default should be to accept parallelism and create #temp tables with distribution instead of opting in (unless someone can enlighten me with an opposing argument.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 14:28:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WLY168</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-18T14:28:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>#Temp tables defined under a different collation to the underlying warehouse</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Temp-tables-defined-under-a-different-collation-to-the/m-p/5134715#M4351</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So Microsoft Fabric goes through a lot of trouble to abstract and provide a programming model that is similar to normal SQL stored procedures. However, session scoped temporary tables (SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS) are created in a collation different to that of an underlying warehouse (Latin1_General_100_BIN2_UTF8). Now I accept the explanation that the underlying engine used for session scoped temporary tables is different. What I don't accept is how an actraction has leaked into the programming model forcing developers to either manually specify collation at create or join time or create the table with distribution. The default should be to accept parallelism and create #temp tables with distribution instead of opting in (unless someone can enlighten me with an opposing argument.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 14:28:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Temp-tables-defined-under-a-different-collation-to-the/m-p/5134715#M4351</guid>
      <dc:creator>WLY168</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-18T14:28:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: #Temp tables defined under a different collation to the underlying warehouse</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Temp-tables-defined-under-a-different-collation-to-the/m-p/5135475#M4355</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" data-lia-user-mentions="" data-lia-user-uid="500994" data-lia-user-login="WLY168" class="lia-mention lia-mention-user"&gt;WLY168&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you for reaching out to the Fabric Forum.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;To help address your question, please refer to the attached documentation below. These resources provide detailed guidance and should clarify the behavior you are experiencing.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you have any further questions after reviewing the documents, feel free to follow up here and we’ll be glad to assist.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/data-warehouse/collation" target="_blank"&gt;Data Warehouse collation - Microsoft Fabric | Microsoft Learn&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/collations/set-or-change-the-column-collation?view=sql-server-ver17#collations-and-tempdb" target="_blank"&gt;Set or Change the Column Collation - SQL Server | Microsoft Learn&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://blog.fabric.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/announcing-the-general-availability-of-session-scoped-distributed-temp-tables-in-fabric-data-warehouse/" target="_blank"&gt;Session-scoped distributed #temp tables in Fabric Data Warehouse (Generally Available) | Microsoft Fabric Blog | Microsoft Fabric&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lakshmi.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 09:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Temp-tables-defined-under-a-different-collation-to-the/m-p/5135475#M4355</guid>
      <dc:creator>v-lgarikapat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-19T09:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: #Temp tables defined under a different collation to the underlying warehouse</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Temp-tables-defined-under-a-different-collation-to-the/m-p/5136214#M4365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" data-lia-user-mentions="" data-lia-user-uid="500994" data-lia-user-login="WLY168" class="lia-mention lia-mention-user"&gt;WLY168&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;there are two types of temp tables in fabric,&amp;nbsp;Non-distributed (default type) and Distributed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Distributed temp tables defaults to the default db collation type.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;here is a link to a blog post with detail on the differences and more detail:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://blog.fabric.microsoft.com/en-US/blog/announcing-the-general-availability-of-session-scoped-distributed-temp-tables-in-fabric-data-warehouse/" target="_blank"&gt;https://blog.fabric.microsoft.com/en-US/blog/announcing-the-general-availability-of-session-scoped-distributed-temp-tables-in-fabric-data-warehouse/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 07:41:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Temp-tables-defined-under-a-different-collation-to-the/m-p/5136214#M4365</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wikkleyn_81</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-20T07:41:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: #Temp tables defined under a different collation to the underlying warehouse</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Temp-tables-defined-under-a-different-collation-to-the/m-p/5137454#M4370</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" data-lia-user-mentions="" data-lia-user-uid="702494" data-lia-user-login="Wikkleyn_81" class="lia-mention lia-mention-user"&gt;Wikkleyn_81&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;“Thanks for your prompt responses.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" data-lia-user-mentions="" data-lia-user-uid="500994" data-lia-user-login="WLY168" class="lia-mention lia-mention-user"&gt;WLY168&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Following up to confirm if the earlier responses addressed your query. If not, please share your questions and we’ll assist further&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lakshmi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:17:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Temp-tables-defined-under-a-different-collation-to-the/m-p/5137454#M4370</guid>
      <dc:creator>v-lgarikapat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-23T10:17:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: #Temp tables defined under a different collation to the underlying warehouse</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Temp-tables-defined-under-a-different-collation-to-the/m-p/5139401#M4400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" data-lia-user-mentions="" data-lia-user-uid="500994" data-lia-user-login="WLY168" class="lia-mention lia-mention-user"&gt;WLY168&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Following up to confirm if the earlier responses addressed your query. If not, please share your questions and we’ll assist further&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lakshmi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:37:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Temp-tables-defined-under-a-different-collation-to-the/m-p/5139401#M4400</guid>
      <dc:creator>v-lgarikapat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-26T11:37:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

