<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Compare Fabric DW and Azure SQL performance in Data Warehouse</title>
    <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Compare-Fabric-DW-and-Azure-SQL-performance/m-p/4134450#M1561</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" data-lia-user-mentions="" data-lia-user-uid="779158" data-lia-user-login="MichelleTW729" class="lia-mention lia-mention-user"&gt;MichelleTW729&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply from AndyDDC&amp;nbsp;.On the comparison of Fabric DW (F8) and Azure SQL P1 or S3/S4, he makes a good point.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A brief summary of how Fabric Data Warehouse compares to ADF+AzureSQL is as follows:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Fabric Data Warehouse&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Better performance and scalability for large-scale analytics projects that require Data Warehouse and Power BI integration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Azure SQL with ADF&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Ideal for projects that require more data integration flexibility and handle smaller workloads.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE width="1082"&gt;
&lt;THEAD&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Feature&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Fabric Data Warehouse&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Azure SQL P1/S3/S4&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/THEAD&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Data Storage&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Delta lake format in OneLake&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Relational storage&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Query Performance&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;High performance, scalable&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Robust&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Integration with Power BI&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seamless integration&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Flexible, needs more configuration&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Suitable Workloads&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Large-scale data warehousing&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Small and medium-sized data processing&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have any other questions please feel free to contact me.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Yang&lt;BR /&gt;Community Support Team&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If there is any post&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;helps&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, then please consider&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Accept it as the solution&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;to help the other members find it more quickly.&lt;BR /&gt;If I misunderstand your needs or you still have problems on it, please feel free to let us know.&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 02:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-05T02:29:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Compare Fabric DW and Azure SQL performance</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Compare-Fabric-DW-and-Azure-SQL-performance/m-p/4133536#M1557</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a project User need DW and Power BI , we try promote Fabric service , but also need compare ADF+AzureSQL which will better ? any compare table about Fabric capacity (F8 ) would near Azure SQL P1 or S3/S4 ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 14:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Compare-Fabric-DW-and-Azure-SQL-performance/m-p/4133536#M1557</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichelleTW729</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-04T14:07:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compare Fabric DW and Azure SQL performance</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Compare-Fabric-DW-and-Azure-SQL-performance/m-p/4133826#M1559</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" data-lia-user-mentions="" data-lia-user-uid="779158" data-lia-user-login="MichelleTW729" class="lia-mention lia-mention-user"&gt;MichelleTW729&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;in terms of directly mapping compute power between Fabric Warehouse and Azure SQL Database, we first look at the number of cores that will be used in the Fabric capacity.&amp;nbsp; For each 1 CU, this gives us 0.5 vCores for the Warehouse service.&amp;nbsp; So an F8 allows us to have 4 vCores.&amp;nbsp; In Azure SQL DB, 100 DTU (I believe) maps to 1 vCore, 200 DTU = 2 vCores etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bear in mind that if you have any other Fabric items running on the capacity, they will also consume compute.&amp;nbsp; E.G. if you have a Warehouse plus Data Pipelines which all run on the F8 capacity, they will share the compute.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will need to do your own testing in your environment to chek performance is adequate for your project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;----------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If my reply has been useful please consider providing kudos&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and marking as the solution for other community users to find&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;----------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 16:28:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Compare-Fabric-DW-and-Azure-SQL-performance/m-p/4133826#M1559</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyDDC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-04T16:28:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compare Fabric DW and Azure SQL performance</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Compare-Fabric-DW-and-Azure-SQL-performance/m-p/4134450#M1561</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" data-lia-user-mentions="" data-lia-user-uid="779158" data-lia-user-login="MichelleTW729" class="lia-mention lia-mention-user"&gt;MichelleTW729&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply from AndyDDC&amp;nbsp;.On the comparison of Fabric DW (F8) and Azure SQL P1 or S3/S4, he makes a good point.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A brief summary of how Fabric Data Warehouse compares to ADF+AzureSQL is as follows:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Fabric Data Warehouse&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Better performance and scalability for large-scale analytics projects that require Data Warehouse and Power BI integration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Azure SQL with ADF&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Ideal for projects that require more data integration flexibility and handle smaller workloads.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE width="1082"&gt;
&lt;THEAD&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Feature&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Fabric Data Warehouse&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Azure SQL P1/S3/S4&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/THEAD&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Data Storage&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Delta lake format in OneLake&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Relational storage&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Query Performance&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;High performance, scalable&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Robust&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Integration with Power BI&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seamless integration&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Flexible, needs more configuration&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Suitable Workloads&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Large-scale data warehousing&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Small and medium-sized data processing&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have any other questions please feel free to contact me.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Yang&lt;BR /&gt;Community Support Team&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If there is any post&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;helps&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, then please consider&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Accept it as the solution&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;to help the other members find it more quickly.&lt;BR /&gt;If I misunderstand your needs or you still have problems on it, please feel free to let us know.&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 02:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Warehouse/Compare-Fabric-DW-and-Azure-SQL-performance/m-p/4134450#M1561</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-05T02:29:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

