<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cross-Tenant Purview Scan of Fabric Lakehouse fails to ingest Sub-items (Delta Tables) in Data Engineering</title>
    <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Cross-Tenant-Purview-Scan-of-Fabric-Lakehouse-fails-to-ingest/m-p/4891801#M13826</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1317394"&gt;@pranavsabnis&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You’re not doing anything “wrong” here – what you’re seeing lines up with the current limits of the Fabric ↔ Purview integration, especially in a cross-tenant setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right now, the Fabric data source in Purview is still in preview, and for most Fabric items it only brings in &lt;STRONG&gt;item-level&lt;/STRONG&gt; metadata and lineage (workspace, lakehouse, warehouse, pipeline, etc.), not the sub-artifacts like individual Delta tables and columns. That behaviour is explicitly called out in the Fabric/Purview integration docs: for non–Power BI items, only the top-level asset is guaranteed; sub-items such as Lakehouse tables and files are not fully supported yet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/microsoft-security-blog/scan-microsoft-fabric-items-in-microsoft-purview/4041470?utm_source" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/microsoft-security-blog/scan-microsoft-fabric-items-in-microsoft-purview/4041470?utm_source&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is work in progress on sub-item metadata for Lakehouse tables and files, but that’s being rolled out in stages and, at the moment, the “nice” experience is focused on same-tenant scenarios. Cross-tenant scans tend to lag a bit in terms of feature parity. So the fact that you can see the Fabric items (workspaces, lakehouses) but get zero Delta tables or column-level entities is very likely due to a product limitation, not your SPN setup or tenant trust configuration. Your current auth flow is clearly good enough for item-level metadata; if auth were the problem, you wouldn’t see the Lakehouse assets at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On your specific questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Changing the SPN from “plain app registration in provider tenant” to some special cross-tenant guest/SPN pattern won’t suddenly unlock table-level ingestion. Since item-level metadata already flows, the cross-tenant trust is working as designed; the missing sub-items come from what the Fabric metadata APIs expose to Purview today, not from the auth shape.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The enhanced metadata settings you’ve enabled are necessary, but in preview they don’t fully override the limitation for Fabric items across tenants. Same-tenant scans are where you’ll see the most benefit first.&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/register-scan-fabric-tenant?utm_source=chatgpt.com&amp;amp;tabs=Scenario1" target="_self"&gt;https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/register-scan-fabric-tenant?utm_source&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Manually pushing table entities into Purview via the Atlas API is technically possible, but it’s brittle: you’d be hand-crafting a catalog that won’t stay in sync with Fabric changes, and you’d be outside the supported Fabric→Purview integration path. It’s more of a last-resort experiment than a sustainable solution.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want a definitive product answer, I’d raise a support ticket or post this exact scenario in the Purview / Fabric governance channel and reference the cross-tenant Fabric scan docs. But from what we know today, the honest state is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In cross-tenant preview, you can reliably get item-level Fabric metadata; table-level Lakehouse metadata and lineage are still limited, and what you’re seeing (no Delta tables, no columns) is expected rather than a misconfiguration.&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/register-scan-fabric-tenant-cross-tenant?utm_source" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/register-scan-fabric-tenant-cross-tenant?utm_source&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you’re not missing a hidden toggle – you’ve essentially hit the edge of what the preview supports right now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;– Gopi Krishna&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 14:09:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ugk161610</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-12-03T14:09:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cross-Tenant Purview Scan of Fabric Lakehouse fails to ingest Sub-items (Delta Tables)</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Cross-Tenant-Purview-Scan-of-Fabric-Lakehouse-fails-to-ingest/m-p/4891789#M13825</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Environment&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Tenant 1 (Consumer): Azure Purview (Microsoft Purview Data Map).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Tenant 2 (Provider): Microsoft Fabric (Capacity + Workspaces).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Architecture: Purview in Tenant 1 is scanning Fabric in Tenant 2 via the "Fabric" Data Source using Azure Auto-Resolve Integration Runtime.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The Issue&lt;/STRONG&gt;: I can successfully scan and see &lt;STRONG&gt;Item-level&lt;/STRONG&gt; metadata (e.g., Workspace Name, Lakehouse Name). However, I am getting &lt;STRONG&gt;Zero sub-item&lt;/STRONG&gt; visibility. No Delta Tables, no Columns, and no sub-item lineage are being ingested into Purview.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Configuration Verified&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Service Principal (SPN)&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Created an App Registration in Tenant 2 (Fabric Tenant).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Permissions&lt;/STRONG&gt;: The SPN is a Member (and I tested Admin) of the target Fabric Workspace.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Fabric Admin Settings (Tenant 2)&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Allow service principals to use read-only admin APIs: Enabled for the SPN's Security Group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enhance admin APIs responses with detailed metadata: Enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enhance admin APIs responses with DAX and mashup expressions: Enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My Specific Questions for the Product Team / MVPs/Members&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Authentication Flow&lt;/STRONG&gt;: For sub-item ingestion (Delta Tables) to work cross-tenant, is it sufficient for the SPN to be a standard App Registration in Tenant 2 (Provider), or does Fabric require the "Cross-Tenant Access" (Guest User) flow where a shadow SPN is created via the specific trusted external tenants configuration?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;API Limitation&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Is the "Enhanced Metadata" API payload (metadata/subartifacts) restricted to Same-Tenant calls only during the current Preview? I suspect the API is returning a standard payload instead of the enhanced one due to the cross-tenant boundary.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Workaround&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Has anyone successfully forced ingestion of Delta Tables cross-tenant by using the Apache Atlas REST API to manually inject the schema entities, or is there a specific hidden toggle in the Fabric Admin Portal (perhaps specifically for "External Principals") that I am missing?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 13:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Cross-Tenant-Purview-Scan-of-Fabric-Lakehouse-fails-to-ingest/m-p/4891789#M13825</guid>
      <dc:creator>pranavsabnis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-03T13:40:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cross-Tenant Purview Scan of Fabric Lakehouse fails to ingest Sub-items (Delta Tables)</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Cross-Tenant-Purview-Scan-of-Fabric-Lakehouse-fails-to-ingest/m-p/4891801#M13826</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1317394"&gt;@pranavsabnis&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You’re not doing anything “wrong” here – what you’re seeing lines up with the current limits of the Fabric ↔ Purview integration, especially in a cross-tenant setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right now, the Fabric data source in Purview is still in preview, and for most Fabric items it only brings in &lt;STRONG&gt;item-level&lt;/STRONG&gt; metadata and lineage (workspace, lakehouse, warehouse, pipeline, etc.), not the sub-artifacts like individual Delta tables and columns. That behaviour is explicitly called out in the Fabric/Purview integration docs: for non–Power BI items, only the top-level asset is guaranteed; sub-items such as Lakehouse tables and files are not fully supported yet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/microsoft-security-blog/scan-microsoft-fabric-items-in-microsoft-purview/4041470?utm_source" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/microsoft-security-blog/scan-microsoft-fabric-items-in-microsoft-purview/4041470?utm_source&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is work in progress on sub-item metadata for Lakehouse tables and files, but that’s being rolled out in stages and, at the moment, the “nice” experience is focused on same-tenant scenarios. Cross-tenant scans tend to lag a bit in terms of feature parity. So the fact that you can see the Fabric items (workspaces, lakehouses) but get zero Delta tables or column-level entities is very likely due to a product limitation, not your SPN setup or tenant trust configuration. Your current auth flow is clearly good enough for item-level metadata; if auth were the problem, you wouldn’t see the Lakehouse assets at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On your specific questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Changing the SPN from “plain app registration in provider tenant” to some special cross-tenant guest/SPN pattern won’t suddenly unlock table-level ingestion. Since item-level metadata already flows, the cross-tenant trust is working as designed; the missing sub-items come from what the Fabric metadata APIs expose to Purview today, not from the auth shape.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The enhanced metadata settings you’ve enabled are necessary, but in preview they don’t fully override the limitation for Fabric items across tenants. Same-tenant scans are where you’ll see the most benefit first.&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/register-scan-fabric-tenant?utm_source=chatgpt.com&amp;amp;tabs=Scenario1" target="_self"&gt;https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/register-scan-fabric-tenant?utm_source&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Manually pushing table entities into Purview via the Atlas API is technically possible, but it’s brittle: you’d be hand-crafting a catalog that won’t stay in sync with Fabric changes, and you’d be outside the supported Fabric→Purview integration path. It’s more of a last-resort experiment than a sustainable solution.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want a definitive product answer, I’d raise a support ticket or post this exact scenario in the Purview / Fabric governance channel and reference the cross-tenant Fabric scan docs. But from what we know today, the honest state is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In cross-tenant preview, you can reliably get item-level Fabric metadata; table-level Lakehouse metadata and lineage are still limited, and what you’re seeing (no Delta tables, no columns) is expected rather than a misconfiguration.&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/register-scan-fabric-tenant-cross-tenant?utm_source" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/register-scan-fabric-tenant-cross-tenant?utm_source&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you’re not missing a hidden toggle – you’ve essentially hit the edge of what the preview supports right now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;– Gopi Krishna&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 14:09:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Cross-Tenant-Purview-Scan-of-Fabric-Lakehouse-fails-to-ingest/m-p/4891801#M13826</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ugk161610</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-03T14:09:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cross-Tenant Purview Scan of Fabric Lakehouse fails to ingest Sub-items (Delta Tables)</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Cross-Tenant-Purview-Scan-of-Fabric-Lakehouse-fails-to-ingest/m-p/4891819#M13827</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/920086"&gt;@Ugk161610&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thanks Gopi for clarifying.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 14:22:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Cross-Tenant-Purview-Scan-of-Fabric-Lakehouse-fails-to-ingest/m-p/4891819#M13827</guid>
      <dc:creator>pranavsabnis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-03T14:22:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cross-Tenant Purview Scan of Fabric Lakehouse fails to ingest Sub-items (Delta Tables)</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Cross-Tenant-Purview-Scan-of-Fabric-Lakehouse-fails-to-ingest/m-p/4891836#M13829</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1317394"&gt;@pranavsabnis&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;If you found this helpful, consider giving some Kudos. If I answered your question or solved your problem, mark this post as the solution.&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 14:38:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Cross-Tenant-Purview-Scan-of-Fabric-Lakehouse-fails-to-ingest/m-p/4891836#M13829</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ugk161610</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-03T14:38:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

