<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Issues with Mixed Authentication Methods in Dataflows Gen2 in Data Engineering</title>
    <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Issues-with-Mixed-Authentication-Methods-in-Dataflows-Gen2/m-p/4774993#M11205</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1249774"&gt;@v-pgoloju&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks a lot for the clarification. Fortunately, there is no major impact - it's just a little inconvinient to keep everything separated.&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Udo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:03:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Udo_S</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-24T11:03:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issues with Mixed Authentication Methods in Dataflows Gen2</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Issues-with-Mixed-Authentication-Methods-in-Dataflows-Gen2/m-p/4773610#M11176</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are using several Dataflows Gen2 with mixed authentication methods. For example, we have a Dataverse connector using Organizational Account authentication, and an on-premises SQL connector (via local gateway) using Basic authentication — both within the same Dataflow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This setup worked fine until a few weeks ago, when the dataflows began to fail with a rather cryptic error message. After some testing, we discovered that using mixed authentication methods in a single dataflow no longer seems to work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I’m aware that the current workaround is to split the data sources into separate dataflows — one for each authentication method — and then join the results. This is how we're handling it for now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Nevertheless, I wanted to reach out to check whether there's another solution, or perhaps a hidden checkbox deep within Fabric that could allow mixed authentication again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Udo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:34:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Issues-with-Mixed-Authentication-Methods-in-Dataflows-Gen2/m-p/4773610#M11176</guid>
      <dc:creator>Udo_S</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-23T11:34:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with Mixed Authentication Methods in Dataflows Gen2</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Issues-with-Mixed-Authentication-Methods-in-Dataflows-Gen2/m-p/4774655#M11193</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/782942"&gt;@Udo_S&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for reaching out to the Microsoft Fabric Forum Community.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;as of recent changes in Microsoft Fabric / Power BI, mixed authentication methods within a single Dataflow Gen2 are no longer supported, even though this used to work previously.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Keep using the split dataflows method that’s the workaround at this point. If your organization is heavily impacted, you may want to submit a support ticket or vote on an idea in the Power BI Ideas forum, especially if this regression wasn’t well documented. Please refer the below document to get more details.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/data-factory/connector-azure-data-lake-storage-gen2" target="_blank"&gt;https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/data-factory/connector-azure-data-lake-storage-gen2&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Prasanna Kumar&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 07:08:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Issues-with-Mixed-Authentication-Methods-in-Dataflows-Gen2/m-p/4774655#M11193</guid>
      <dc:creator>v-pgoloju</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-24T07:08:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with Mixed Authentication Methods in Dataflows Gen2</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Issues-with-Mixed-Authentication-Methods-in-Dataflows-Gen2/m-p/4774993#M11205</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1249774"&gt;@v-pgoloju&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks a lot for the clarification. Fortunately, there is no major impact - it's just a little inconvinient to keep everything separated.&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Udo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:03:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Data-Engineering/Issues-with-Mixed-Authentication-Methods-in-Dataflows-Gen2/m-p/4774993#M11205</guid>
      <dc:creator>Udo_S</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-24T11:03:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

