<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: data partitioning in SQL server using XMLA end points in Developer</title>
    <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Developer/data-partitioning-in-SQL-server-using-XMLA-end-points/m-p/1280826#M25130</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi @Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is my understanding that the main benefit of partitioning an in-memory Power BI model via XMLA - is to allow partial refreshes of data (faster refreshes where you only refresh the partitions you need). I am not aware of any performance benefits that would be made by partitioning your tables in this way (I could be mistaken though).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you are struggling with a slow visual, then it is probably worth focusing on the query that is being run.&lt;BR /&gt;Accessing the Performance Analyzer will let you see the query being run. &lt;A href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/create-reports/desktop-performance-analyzer" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/create-reports/desktop-performance-analyzer&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would then recommend putting the query though the excellent DAX Studio tool:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A title="DAX Studio" href="https://daxstudio.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://daxstudio.org/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It takes a bit of time to learn what DAX Studio is telling you - but it will highlight number of rows read, cache hits, and excessive CPU usage - and might lead you to where the underlying problem is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps, Matt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 16:41:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-08-07T16:41:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>data partitioning in SQL server using XMLA end points</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Developer/data-partitioning-in-SQL-server-using-XMLA-end-points/m-p/1276303#M25095</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure if this is the correct forum to ask this question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have data model published in the premium workspace. It has around 10 million rows of data and some reports are build on this and published to the premium workspace.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some of the visuals are working fine but some are taking more time to refresh than expected. My workaround is to manually partition the data using the SQL Server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using XMLA endpoints to connect to my dataset in the SQL server. This is the first time I am trying to do the partitioning so need help from the experts on how to do it and if its the best way to reduce the latency time in my reports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please guide me to any resource if you have any.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 04:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Developer/data-partitioning-in-SQL-server-using-XMLA-end-points/m-p/1276303#M25095</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-06T04:25:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data partitioning in SQL server using XMLA end points</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Developer/data-partitioning-in-SQL-server-using-XMLA-end-points/m-p/1280826#M25130</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi @Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is my understanding that the main benefit of partitioning an in-memory Power BI model via XMLA - is to allow partial refreshes of data (faster refreshes where you only refresh the partitions you need). I am not aware of any performance benefits that would be made by partitioning your tables in this way (I could be mistaken though).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you are struggling with a slow visual, then it is probably worth focusing on the query that is being run.&lt;BR /&gt;Accessing the Performance Analyzer will let you see the query being run. &lt;A href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/create-reports/desktop-performance-analyzer" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/create-reports/desktop-performance-analyzer&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would then recommend putting the query though the excellent DAX Studio tool:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A title="DAX Studio" href="https://daxstudio.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://daxstudio.org/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It takes a bit of time to learn what DAX Studio is telling you - but it will highlight number of rows read, cache hits, and excessive CPU usage - and might lead you to where the underlying problem is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps, Matt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 16:41:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Developer/data-partitioning-in-SQL-server-using-XMLA-end-points/m-p/1280826#M25130</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-07T16:41:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

