<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Can'r create a Direct Active Relationship in DAX Commands and Tips</title>
    <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Can-r-create-a-Direct-Active-Relationship/m-p/2412199#M63573</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a number of different data tables [&lt;EM&gt;DT1:DT7]&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;which have a relationship to a single employee table [&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt;} so that I can pick an employee from [&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt;} and it will filter all seven tables - this is working fine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I now have an 8th data table that I also want to create a relationship to [Emp] but it is saying I cannot as would introduce ambiguity between &lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;EM&gt;DT3&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't see why this works on the other &lt;EM&gt;DTs&lt;/EM&gt; but not &lt;EM&gt;DT8&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;This explains the relationships that are already working:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT1&lt;/STRONG&gt; Employee_SID &lt;/EM&gt;Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT2&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;UserID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT3&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;Employee_SID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT4&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;OwnerID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT5&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;Emp_ID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT6&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;Owned_BYID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT7&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;ChngdByID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;And the one that is now causing the issue&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT8&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;CreatedBYID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any advice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 11:53:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PBI_Inquisitor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-23T11:53:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can'r create a Direct Active Relationship</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Can-r-create-a-Direct-Active-Relationship/m-p/2412199#M63573</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a number of different data tables [&lt;EM&gt;DT1:DT7]&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;which have a relationship to a single employee table [&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt;} so that I can pick an employee from [&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt;} and it will filter all seven tables - this is working fine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I now have an 8th data table that I also want to create a relationship to [Emp] but it is saying I cannot as would introduce ambiguity between &lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;EM&gt;DT3&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't see why this works on the other &lt;EM&gt;DTs&lt;/EM&gt; but not &lt;EM&gt;DT8&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;This explains the relationships that are already working:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT1&lt;/STRONG&gt; Employee_SID &lt;/EM&gt;Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT2&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;UserID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT3&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;Employee_SID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT4&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;OwnerID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT5&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;Emp_ID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT6&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;Owned_BYID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT7&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;ChngdByID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;And the one that is now causing the issue&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DT8&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;CreatedBYID Relates to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Emp&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;EmpID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any advice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 11:53:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Can-r-create-a-Direct-Active-Relationship/m-p/2412199#M63573</guid>
      <dc:creator>PBI_Inquisitor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-23T11:53:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can'r create a Direct Active Relationship</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Can-r-create-a-Direct-Active-Relationship/m-p/2412269#M63582</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" data-lia-user-mentions="" data-lia-user-uid="332470" data-lia-user-login="PBI_Inquisitor" class="lia-mention lia-mention-user"&gt;PBI_Inquisitor&lt;/a&gt; , This may be because of bi-direction joins &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Make all One -Many join as single direction&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Can-r-create-a-Direct-Active-Relationship/m-p/2412269#M63582</guid>
      <dc:creator>amitchandak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-23T12:21:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can'r create a Direct Active Relationship</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Can-r-create-a-Direct-Active-Relationship/m-p/2412440#M63598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Amitchandak - seems to have done the trick - swapped around each relationship as well eg Emp - DT1; Emp to DT2.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards, Phil&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:18:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Can-r-create-a-Direct-Active-Relationship/m-p/2412440#M63598</guid>
      <dc:creator>PBI_Inquisitor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-23T13:18:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

