<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column in DAX Commands and Tips</title>
    <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/762698#M3258</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;Anonymous&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the attached file from you, you have a measure created by you for cumulative % of total.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I used the same measure for my visual and other calculation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I used the measure in a filtered table, the measure gets recalculates for the visible range summation which I do not need.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly suggest a way for me to get the cumulative percentage displayed in the right sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need only the filters applied on page and report level (Date, tray size &amp;amp; unit status) to affect and the filter applied on the visual level not to affect the result.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly do the needful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additionally, If I use "switch" over the measure you give, I may use the same as indicator say till 80% show as First, next 15% shows as second and remaining 5% shows as last. Is this sounds correct way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 09:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vissvess</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-09T09:01:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/754171#M2911</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My data set is similar as follows.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;SaleID&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Qty&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Configuration&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;9810&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;81&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Modualar&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;7598&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;37&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Segment&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;8757&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;58&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Pieces&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;7861&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;102&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Modular&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;7783&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;84&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Modular&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;6818&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;30&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Modular&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;9625&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;84&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Segment&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;8257&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;22&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Segment&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;8822&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;89&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Modular&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;8962&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;12&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Modular&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;7904&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;83&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Segment&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;7218&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;103&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Pieces&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;8899&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;89&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Separate&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I summarize this as&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Row LabelsSum of QtyGrand Total874&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Config&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Sum of qty&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Modualar&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;81&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Modular&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;317&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Pieces&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;161&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Segment&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;226&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Separate&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;89&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need a filter or slicer of custom discrete percentage value that should select the topN config that contribute to say, 80% of the total.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Else a slider for the percentage value say, 80% to filter the config column based on sum of topN corresponding qty which accounts for the selected percentage of volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two card (say buttons) to be shown stating the above and below discrete aggregate available for selection, that for the selected slicer/filter/slider value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lets elaborate,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Row Labels&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Sum of Qty&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;(for ref)&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Modular&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;317&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;36%&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Segment&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;226&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;26%&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Pieces&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;161&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;18%&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Separate&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;89&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;10%&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Modualar&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;81&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;9%&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Total&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;874&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;100%&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, if a filter/slicer/slider is selected for say 80%,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;one card/button to show the "lesser aggregate value is 62%" (is the sum of modular &amp;amp; segment)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;another card/button to show the "higher aggregate value is 81%" (is the sum of modular, segment &amp;amp; pieces)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If any one of the two card is selected, the filter has to be applied accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think the requirement is impractical with so many enthusiasts out here...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Advance thanks for the solution.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:02:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/754171#M2911</guid>
      <dc:creator>vissvess</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T16:02:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/754469#M2931</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Play around with this one:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApyQEauTSLtO6m_fBeCmFvvD5AKO" target="_blank"&gt;https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApyQEauTSLtO6m_fBeCmFvvD5AKO&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Darek&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:11:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/754469#M2931</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T23:11:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/754510#M2934</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear&amp;nbsp;Anonymous&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So far, so good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The final step is to select either lesser/higher aggregate, which in turn filters/multiple selects the configuration column.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly provide workaround for the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vissvess&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:30:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/754510#M2934</guid>
      <dc:creator>vissvess</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-01T00:30:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/760530#M3177</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;Anonymous&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The solution is awesome...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Lets change a slight requirement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything your worked around is fine and very handy.. Thanks a lot...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please suggest me how to use the percent filter in the top to filter the table below to its cumulative percentage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If say 80% is selected, if lesser aggregate is closer than higher aggreate to the selected slicer value, lesser aggregate value filter should be applied.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Similarly if higher aggregate is clocer to the selected slicer value than the lesser aggregate, the vice versa to be happen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pl. do the needful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 14:11:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/760530#M3177</guid>
      <dc:creator>vissvess</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-07T14:11:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/761469#M3217</link>
      <description>It's ,of course, doable but I have to find some time to look at this...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best&lt;BR /&gt;Darek</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/761469#M3217</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-08T08:33:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/762698#M3258</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;Anonymous&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the attached file from you, you have a measure created by you for cumulative % of total.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I used the same measure for my visual and other calculation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I used the measure in a filtered table, the measure gets recalculates for the visible range summation which I do not need.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly suggest a way for me to get the cumulative percentage displayed in the right sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need only the filters applied on page and report level (Date, tray size &amp;amp; unit status) to affect and the filter applied on the visual level not to affect the result.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly do the needful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additionally, If I use "switch" over the measure you give, I may use the same as indicator say till 80% show as First, next 15% shows as second and remaining 5% shows as last. Is this sounds correct way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 09:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/762698#M3258</guid>
      <dc:creator>vissvess</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-09T09:01:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/763379#M3292</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;Anonymous&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on your work, I have modified the formula to suit my need as follows.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cumulative % of Total = &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;var __visibleConfigs = ALL(ConfigDetails[Chassis])&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;var __totalQtyForVisibleConfigs =&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CALCULATE(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[Quantity],&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;__visibleConfigs&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;var __currentQty = [Quantity]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;var __visibleConfigsWithGreaterOrEqualQty =&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;FILTER(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;__visibleConfigs,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[Quantity] &amp;gt;= __currentQty&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;var __cumulativeQty =&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CALCULATE(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[Quantity],&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;__visibleConfigsWithGreaterOrEqualQty&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;var __cumulativeQtyPercent =&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;if (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ISEMPTY( __visibleConfigsWithGreaterOrEqualQty ),&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;DIVIDE( __cumulativeQty, __totalQtyForVisibleConfigs )&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;return&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;__cumulativeQtyPercent&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is great, but on applying a filter, the total gets recalculated to the filtered contents summing to 100%.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But also I need the filter to be only retained for one filter in the same column and two other filters in two other different columns from two tables.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please provide the range selection for _visible configs.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have started reading many articles in sqlbi.com to understand the nature of ALL, ALLEXCEPT &amp;amp; more.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yet, need your kind help.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 12:49:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/763379#M3292</guid>
      <dc:creator>vissvess</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-10T12:49:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/763995#M3313</link>
      <description>Mate, I've added one more measures [Closest Cummulative Value]. Have a look, it's in the same file.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What do you mean by gets recalculated for the visible range summation? I thought you wanted to calculate the cummul percentage for the configs visible in the visual. This makes sense. If you want to calculate this for all the configs in your table, you'll have to change ALLSELECTED in the measures to ALL.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best&lt;BR /&gt;Darek</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:14:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/763995#M3313</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-12T09:14:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/763998#M3314</link>
      <description>Without knowing the full model and the exact requirements (you mention some columns but without names and where they belong), I can't give you any solution.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best&lt;BR /&gt;Darek</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:16:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/763998#M3314</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-12T09:16:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/764079#M3322</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes Anonymous&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are right. I donot want it to get recalculated on the visible range.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have converted the same as mentioned by you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But there is a small addition in the requiremnt. It has to consider the only three filters and other than that to be removed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The three filters are calender[Date], 'time bucket'[bucket] &amp;amp; Config[Traysize].&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, Kindly help for this first requirement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, another requiremtn is a seperate measure using the above measure to display a text as such F(&amp;lt;=80%), M(&amp;gt;80% &amp;amp; &amp;lt;=95%) and R(&amp;gt;95%).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help me with the two above requriemnt.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:17:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/764079#M3322</guid>
      <dc:creator>vissvess</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-12T10:17:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filter a column based on top N aggregation value of another column</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/764095#M3323</link>
      <description>I need to know the model's layout to do that.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best&lt;BR /&gt;Darek</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:32:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/DAX-Commands-and-Tips/Filter-a-column-based-on-top-N-aggregation-value-of-another/m-p/764095#M3323</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-12T10:32:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

