<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: conditional formatting lost when USERELATIONSHIP ist used in Custom Visuals Development Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4629131#M12377</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The issue I'm facing is with the "processing quality" column, which has conditional formatting. Specifically, cells that indicate "on-time processing" have a green checkmark, while cells that indicate "SLA exceeded" have a red cross and a red background.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when I filter by Sales Manager "Christian," I get all the data based on my helper column (the last column in the table). The problem is that the formatting disappears for all ZIP codes where the Creator ZIP does not belong to Christian. Since he is the Processor, the formatting should still be applied.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here is also a screenshot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot Bedingte Formatierung.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1255122iEFE224F84BEC00DF/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot Bedingte Formatierung.jpg" alt="Screenshot Bedingte Formatierung.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ps.: the second ZIP should be the processor ZIP.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunatly i couldn't insert the tables in one message.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:20:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cornaSn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-28T11:20:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>conditional formatting lost when USERELATIONSHIP ist used</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4627363#M12362</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a table with two important values and two connections to the data model. Since I need the second value in my table, I used the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;USERELATIONSHIP&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;function. Some data in the table is conditionally formatted, but this formatting is partially lost when using a slicer. I assume the slicer is applied to the "main" value where the connection is always active.&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a workaround or a better solution than duplicating the entire table?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the help!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:17:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4627363#M12362</guid>
      <dc:creator>cornaSn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-27T11:17:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: conditional formatting lost when USERELATIONSHIP ist used</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4627562#M12363</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please give use something to work with.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Please provide sample data that covers your issue or question &lt;STRONG&gt;completely&lt;/STRONG&gt;, in a &lt;STRONG&gt;usable&lt;/STRONG&gt; format (not as a screenshot).&lt;BR /&gt;Do not include sensitive information. Do not include anything that is unrelated to the issue or question. &lt;BR /&gt;Please show the expected outcome based on the sample data you provided. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Need help uploading data? &lt;A href="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Community-Blog/How-to-provide-sample-data-in-the-Power-BI-Forum/ba-p/963216" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Community-Blog/How-to-provide-sample-data-in-the-Power-BI-Forum/ba-p/963216&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Want faster answers? &lt;A href="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Desktop/How-to-Get-Your-Question-Answered-Quickly/m-p/1447523" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Desktop/How-to-Get-Your-Question-Answered-Quickly/m-p/1447523&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:40:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4627562#M12363</guid>
      <dc:creator>lbendlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-27T12:40:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: conditional formatting lost when USERELATIONSHIP ist used</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4628266#M12368</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you using a measure for the formatting. Is the colour selected with selectedvalue() and userelationship results in a blank??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 20:57:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4628266#M12368</guid>
      <dc:creator>Deku</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-27T20:57:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: conditional formatting lost when USERELATIONSHIP ist used</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4629062#M12372</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So this is my visual Table: (the last column is there due to the USERELATIONSHIP otherwise, the data would now show when I filter with Sales Manager from the second table.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Table 1:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Index&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Creator ZIP&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Date of Creation&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Processor ZIP&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Product&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Processingquality&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Date of processing&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Completed on&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Status&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;ZIP_Processor_Measure&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;45678&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;27.01.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;45678&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;A&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Timely processing&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;27.01.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;27.01.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;successfully completed&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;2&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;56789&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;28.02.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;56789&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;B&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Timely processing&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;28.02.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;28.02.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;successfully completed&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;3&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;55551&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;17.03.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;19283&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;B&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Timely processing&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;17.03.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;25.03.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;successfully completed&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;4&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;3922&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;27.02.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;37465&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;A&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Timely processing&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;27.02.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;in process&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;5&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;3313&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;22.01.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;12349&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;A&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Timely processing&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;22.01.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;22.01.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;not successfully completed&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;6&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;3370&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;24.01.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;12349&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;A&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Timely processing&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;27.01.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;27.01.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;not successfully completed&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;7&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;45678&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;20.02.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;45678&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;C&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;SLA exceeded&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;25.02.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;25.02.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;not successfully completed&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;8&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;98761&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;03.03.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;98761&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;B&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Timely processing&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;03.03.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;03.03.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;not successfully completed&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;9&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;23459&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;16.01.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;23459&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;A&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;SLA exceeded&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;open&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;10&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;87651&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;12.02.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;87651&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;A&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;SLA exceeded&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;open&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;11&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;23459&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;18.02.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;23459&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;A&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;SLA exceeded&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;open&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;12&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;23459&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;19.03.2025&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;23459&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;B&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;SLA exceeded&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;open&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Table 2:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;ZIP Code&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Sales Manager&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;12345&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Max&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;23456&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Alex&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;34567&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Cathy&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;45678&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;56789&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;19283&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;37465&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;12349&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;12349&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;45678&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;98761&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;23459&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;87651&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;23459&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;23459&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Christian&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;55551&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Anthony&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue I'm facing is with the "processing quality" column, which has conditional formatting. Specifically, cells that indicate "on-time processing" have a green checkmark, while cells that indicate "SLA exceeded" have a red cross and a red background.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when I filter by Sales Manager "Christian," I get all the data based on my helper column (the last column in the table). The problem is that the formatting disappears for all ZIP codes where the Creator ZIP does not belong to Christian. Since he is the Processor, the formatting should still be applied.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Additionally, I used the USERELATIONSHIP function in the table to manage the relationship between the Creator ZIP and Processor ZIP.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here is also a screenshot of the issue. The conditional formatting should be applied to all of the data&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot Bedingte Formatierung.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1255114iDBA83190232C4728/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot Bedingte Formatierung.jpg" alt="Screenshot Bedingte Formatierung.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;ps.: In the screenshot the second ZIP Code should be the Processor ZIP&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 10:55:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4629062#M12372</guid>
      <dc:creator>cornaSn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-28T10:55:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: conditional formatting lost when USERELATIONSHIP ist used</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4629117#M12374</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The conditional formatting is done via rules, if it contains a certain word, then take the symbol X&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:12:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4629117#M12374</guid>
      <dc:creator>cornaSn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-28T11:12:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: conditional formatting lost when USERELATIONSHIP ist used</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4629131#M12377</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The issue I'm facing is with the "processing quality" column, which has conditional formatting. Specifically, cells that indicate "on-time processing" have a green checkmark, while cells that indicate "SLA exceeded" have a red cross and a red background.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when I filter by Sales Manager "Christian," I get all the data based on my helper column (the last column in the table). The problem is that the formatting disappears for all ZIP codes where the Creator ZIP does not belong to Christian. Since he is the Processor, the formatting should still be applied.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here is also a screenshot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot Bedingte Formatierung.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1255122iEFE224F84BEC00DF/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot Bedingte Formatierung.jpg" alt="Screenshot Bedingte Formatierung.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ps.: the second ZIP should be the processor ZIP.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunatly i couldn't insert the tables in one message.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:20:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4629131#M12377</guid>
      <dc:creator>cornaSn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-28T11:20:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: conditional formatting lost when USERELATIONSHIP ist used</title>
      <link>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4629354#M12381</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just came to an solution, I used for the processing quality also a measure with USERELATIONSHIP and then used coniditonal formatting, that solved the Problem.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 13:22:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Custom-Visuals-Development/conditional-formatting-lost-when-USERELATIONSHIP-ist-used/m-p/4629354#M12381</guid>
      <dc:creator>cornaSn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-28T13:22:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

